Literature DB >> 20952781

The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression.

Jason Haberman1, David Whitney.   

Abstract

There has been a recent surge in the study of ensemble coding, the idea that the visual system represents a set of similar items using summary statistics (Alvarez & Oliva, 2008; Ariely, 2001; Chong & Treisman, 2003; Parkes, Lund, Angelucci, Solomon, & Morgan, 2001). We previously demonstrated that this ability extends to faces and thus requires a high level of object processing (Haberman & Whitney, 2007, 2009). Recent debate has centered on the nature of the summary representation of size (e.g., Myczek & Simons, 2008) and whether the perceived average simply reflects the sampling of a very small subset of the items in a set. In the present study, we explored this further in the context of faces, asking observers to judge the average expressions of sets of faces containing emotional outliers. Our results suggest that the visual system implicitly and unintentionally discounts the emotional outliers, thereby computing a summary representation that encompasses the vast majority of the information present. Additional computational modeling and behavioral results reveal that an intentional cognitive sampling strategy does not accurately capture observer performance. Observers derive precise ensemble information given a 250-msec exposure, suggesting a rapid and flexible system not bound by the limits of serial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952781      PMCID: PMC3123539          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  35 in total

1.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

3.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The human visual system averages speed information.

Authors:  S N Watamaniuk; A Duchon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Attention modulates set representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert; Alexander P Marchant
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-07

7.  Ideal observer for discrimination of the global direction of dynamic random-dot stimuli.

Authors:  S N Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise.

Authors:  S N Watamaniuk; S P McKee; N M Grzywacz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  A 'dipper' function for texture discrimination based on orientation variance.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Charles Chubb; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Ensemble statistics accessed through proxies: Range heuristic and dependence on low-level properties in variability discrimination.

Authors:  Jonas Sin-Heng Lau; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Priming by the variability of visual information.

Authors:  Elizabeth Michael; Vincent de Gardelle; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficient summary statistical representation when change localization fails.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

4.  Differential hemispheric and visual stream contributions to ensemble coding of crowd emotion.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Daniel N Albohn; Troy G Steiner; Cody A Cushing; Reginald B Adams; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-10-09

5.  One bad apple spoils the whole bushel: The neural basis of outlier processing.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Error-driven learning in statistical summary perception.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Extraction of mean emotional tone from face arrays in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Zohar Z Bronfman; Noam Brezis; Amit Lazarov; Marius Usher; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Tracking the relation between gist and item memory over the course of long-term memory consolidation.

Authors:  Tima Zeng; Alexa Tompary; Anna C Schapiro; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Ensemble crowd perception: a viewpoint-invariant mechanism to represent average crowd identity.

Authors:  Allison Yamanashi Leib; Jason Fischer; Yang Liu; Sang Qiu; Lynn Robertson; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice.

Authors:  Hildward Vandormael; Santiago Herce Castañón; Jan Balaguer; Vickie Li; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.