Literature DB >> 28223519

Robust sampling of decision information during perceptual choice.

Hildward Vandormael1, Santiago Herce Castañón2, Jan Balaguer2, Vickie Li2, Christopher Summerfield2.   

Abstract

Humans move their eyes to gather information about the visual world. However, saccadic sampling has largely been explored in paradigms that involve searching for a lone target in a cluttered array or natural scene. Here, we investigated the policy that humans use to overtly sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spatial locations to be combined. Participants viewed a spatial array of numbers and judged whether the average was greater or smaller than a reference value. Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer ("inlying" elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value). This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to give more weight to inlying elements in the final choice ("robust averaging"). These findings contrast with a large body of evidence indicating that gaze is directed preferentially to deviant information during natural scene viewing and visual search, and suggest that humans may sample information "robustly" with their eyes during perceptual decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  categorization; decision-making; eye movements; information sampling; numerical averaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28223519      PMCID: PMC5347592          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613950114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Christof Koch; Antonio Rangel; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Attention, reward, and information seeking.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb; Mary Hayhoe; Okihide Hikosaka; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsetsos; Rani Moran; James Moreland; Nick Chater; Marius Usher; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Search goal tunes visual features optimally.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Waiting and weighting: Information sampling is a balance between efficiency and error-reduction.

Authors:  Kimberly M Meier; Mark R Blair
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-10-23

9.  Human visual search does not maximize the post-saccadic probability of identifying targets.

Authors:  Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Adaptive sampling of information in perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Thomas C Cassey; David R Evens; Rafal Bogacz; James A R Marshall; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Dopamine and Proximity in Motivation and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-04

3.  The virtual loss function in the summary perception of motion and its limited adjustability.

Authors:  Tianyuan Teng; Sheng Li; Hang Zhang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Human representation of multimodal distributions as clusters of samples.

Authors:  Jingwei Sun; Jian Li; Hang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Response-locked classification image analysis of perceptual decision making in contrast detection.

Authors:  Hironori Maruyama; Natsuki Ueno; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Ji Won Bang; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The averaging of numerosities: A psychometric investigation of the mental line.

Authors:  Naama Katzin; David Rosenbaum; Marius Usher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Peak-at-end rule: adaptive mechanism predicts time-dependent decision weighting.

Authors:  Ryuto Yashiro; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.