Literature DB >> 20952500

Effective population size is positively correlated with levels of adaptive divergence among annual sunflowers.

Jared L Strasburg1, Nolan C Kane, Andrew R Raduski, Aurélie Bonin, Richard Michelmore, Loren H Rieseberg.   

Abstract

The role of adaptation in the divergence of lineages has long been a central question in evolutionary biology, and as multilocus sequence data sets have become available for a wide range of taxa, empirical estimates of levels of adaptive molecular evolution are increasingly common. Estimates vary widely among taxa, with high levels of adaptive evolution in Drosophila, bacteria, and viruses but very little evidence of widespread adaptive evolution in hominids. Although estimates in plants are more limited, some recent work has suggested that rates of adaptive evolution in a range of plant taxa are surprisingly low and that there is little association between adaptive evolution and effective population size in contrast to patterns seen in other taxa. Here, we analyze data from 35 loci for six sunflower species that vary dramatically in effective population size. We find that rates of adaptive evolution are positively correlated with effective population size in these species, with a significant fraction of amino acid substitutions driven by positive selection in the species with the largest effective population sizes but little or no evidence of adaptive evolution in species with smaller effective population sizes. Although other factors likely contribute as well, in sunflowers effective population size appears to be an important determinant of rates of adaptive evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952500      PMCID: PMC3080132          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  64 in total

1.  CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program.

Authors:  X Huang; A Madan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  The neutral theory in the genomic era.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome.

Authors:  J C Fay; G J Wyckoff; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Rasmus Nielsen; Stanley A Sawyer; Kenneth M Olsen; Michael D Purugganan; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The role of population size in molecular evolution.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley; Nick G C Smith; Daniel Gaffney
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Patterns of genetic variation suggest a single, ancient origin for the diploid hybrid species Helianthus paradoxus.

Authors:  Mark E Welch; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  43 in total

1.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Evidence for widespread positive and purifying selection across the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome.

Authors:  Miguel Carneiro; Frank W Albert; José Melo-Ferreira; Nicolas Galtier; Philippe Gayral; Jose A Blanco-Aguiar; Rafael Villafuerte; Michael W Nachman; Nuno Ferrand
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Genomic islands of divergence are not affected by geography of speciation in sunflowers.

Authors:  S Renaut; C J Grassa; S Yeaman; B T Moyers; Z Lai; N C Kane; J E Bowers; J M Burke; L H Rieseberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Jill L Wegrzyn; John D Liechty; Jennifer M Lee; W Patrick Cumbie; John M Davis; Barry Goldfarb; Carol A Loopstra; Sreenath R Palle; Tania Quesada; Charles H Langley; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Convergent Evolution of the Osmoregulation System in Decapod Shrimps.

Authors:  Jianbo Yuan; Xiaojun Zhang; Chengzhang Liu; Hu Duan; Fuhua Li; Jianhai Xiang
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  Weak selection and protein evolution.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Naoki Osada; Tomoko Ohta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.

Authors:  David Castellano; Moisès Coll Macià; Paula Tataru; Thomas Bataillon; Kasper Munch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effect of genetic drift on determinants of protein evolution.

Authors:  Sankar Subramanian
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Chromosomal evolution and patterns of introgression in helianthus.

Authors:  Jessica G Barb; John E Bowers; Sebastien Renaut; Juan I Rey; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg; John M Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.