Literature DB >> 20952145

Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young, active patient: Tegner activity level and failure rate.

Gene R Barrett1, Kurre Luber, William H Replogle, Josie L Manley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose was to analyze outcomes of nonirradiated, fresh-frozen bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients aged under 40 years with regard to activity level (Tegner score).
METHODS: Between 1993 and 2005, 111 patients, aged under 40 years, underwent primary, nonirradiated, fresh-frozen BPTB allograft ACL reconstruction and were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was limited to a minimum of 24 months. Patients with concomitant ligament injuries and previous surgeries were excluded. Seventy-eight patients met the inclusion criterion and were available for follow-up. Four hundred eleven patients had BPTB autograft ACL reconstructions and comprised the control group. Failure of the graft was defined as repeat ACL reconstruction because of reinjury or graft failure, 2+ Lachman (no endpoint), any pivot shift, and/or 5-mm side-to-side KT-1000 difference (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) or greater. Initial examinations, surgical findings, and follow-up examinations were prospectively entered into a computerized relational database. The results were assessed by both objective and subjective measures.
RESULTS: High-activity allograft patients had a 2.6- to 4.2-fold increase in the probability of graft failure compared with low-activity BPTB allograft patients and low- and high-activity BPTB autograft patients. Patients undergoing BPTB autograft reconstruction reported significantly fewer problems on a visual analog scale and scored significantly higher on the postoperative Tegner activity scale than patients undergoing allograft reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The active allograft group is 2.6 to 4.2 times more likely to fail compared with low-activity allografts and low- and high-activity autografts. We conclude that fresh-frozen BPTB allografts should not be used in young patients who have a high Tegner activity score because of their higher risk of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952145     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  28 in total

1.  Anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle with semitendinosus allograft.

Authors:  Yinghui Hua; Shiyi Chen; Yongjia Jin; Bimeng Zhang; Yunxia Li; Hong Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades.

Authors:  Markus P Arnold; Jacob G Calcei; Nicole Vogel; Robert A Magnussen; Mark Clatworthy; Tim Spalding; John D Campbell; John A Bergfeld; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Surgeon experience with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization does not influence risk of failure.

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Kathrin S Bieri; Janosch Haeberli; Nele Arnout; Jan Victor; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Koesters; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Variance in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Selection based on Patient Demographics and Location within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Cohort.

Authors:  Darby A Houck; Matthew J Kraeutler; Armando F Vidal; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Michelle L Wolcott
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Internal Brace Augmentation.

Authors:  Patrick A Smith; Jordan A Bley
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-10

Review 7.  Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Jin Qu; Daqi Xu; Jingyong Zhou; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Julian Feller; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allografts in patients younger than 40 years old: a 2 to 4 year results.

Authors:  Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; L Carbo; A Makino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in skeletally mature patients aged 25 years or younger.

Authors:  Patrick W Kane; Jocelyn Wascher; Christopher C Dodson; Sommer Hammoud; Steven B Cohen; Michael G Ciccotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.