Literature DB >> 23612778

Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allografts in patients younger than 40 years old: a 2 to 4 year results.

Cecilia Pascual-Garrido1, L Carbo, A Makino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is first to report the outcomes, at 4 years follow-up, in revision ACL surgery using allografts in patients younger than 40 years old, and then compared soft tissue allografts to bone tendon allografts.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent ACL revision surgery with fresh-frozen allografts. Patellar tendon allograft or tibialis anterior allograft was used. Twenty-seven patients undergoing ACL revision with patellar tendon allograft were compared retrospectively with twenty-two patients undergoing the same procedure with soft tissue tibialis anterior allograft. Lysholm, IKDC, and KT-1000 values were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: The average patient follow-up was 4.6 years (±2.5). The mean age at time of the revision was 34 years old (±6.3). Overall, patients reported the overall condition of their knee as excellent or good in 85% of the patients (10 excellent, 33 good). Based on their experience, 85% would have the surgery again if they had the same problem in the other knee. Both subgroups experienced significant improvement in Lysholm, IKDC, and KT-1000 values, with no difference found between groups at final follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Revision ACL with allografts has excellent and good results in 85% of patients younger than 40 years old. No statistical difference was seen between soft tissue (tibialis anterior) and patellar tendon allograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23612778     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2507-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Volker Steuber; Daniel Kendoff; Dan Choi; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle; David W Altchek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: which graft is best?

Authors:  Orrin H Sherman; Michael B Banffy
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy.

Authors:  Mark Pallis; Steven J Svoboda; Kenneth L Cameron; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: two-year results from the MOON cohort.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; David C Flanigan; Morgan Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Armando Vidal; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament surgery using anterior tibialis allograft.

Authors:  Manuj C Singhal; James R Gardiner; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament allograft transplantation. Long-term function, histology, revascularization, and operative technique.

Authors:  P K Nikolaou; A V Seaber; R R Glisson; B M Ribbeck; F H Bassett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler; Warren R Dunn; Amanda K Haas; Christina R Allen; Daniel E Cooper; Thomas M DeBerardino; Brett Brick A Lantz; Barton J Mann; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The effect of graft tissue on anterior cruciate ligament outcomes: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing autograft hamstrings with fresh-frozen anterior tibialis allograft.

Authors:  Keith W Lawhorn; Stephen M Howell; Steve M Traina; John E Gottlieb; Thomas D Meade; Howard I Freedberg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Martin Lind; Frank Menhert; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A prospective study to assess the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Samer Samir Sayed Mahmoud; Saurabh Odak; Stephen Coogan; Michael J McNicholas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps or hamstring autografts leads to similar results after 4 years: good objective stability but low rate of return to pre-injury sport level.

Authors:  Alexander Barié; Yannick Ehmann; Ayham Jaber; Jürgen Huber; Nikolaus A Streich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Italian consensus statement for the use of allografts in ACL reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Corrado Bait; Pietro Randelli; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Rocco Papalia; Filippo Familiari; Andrea Tecame; Paolo Adravanti; Ezio Adriani; Enrico Arnaldi; Franco Benazzo; Massimo Berruto; Giovanni Bonaspetti; Gian Luigi Canata; Pier Paolo Canè; Araldo Causero; Giancarlo Coari; Matteo Denti; Maristella Farè; Andrea Ferretti; Marco Fravisini; Francesco Giron; Alberto Gobbi; Vincenzo Madonna; Andrea Manunta; Pier Paolo Mariani; Claudio Mazzola; Giuseppe Milano; Luigi Pederzini; Flavio Quaglia; Mario Ronga; Herbert Schönhuber; Giacomo Stefani; Piero Volpi; Giacomo Zanon; Raul Zini; Claudio Zorzi; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Femoral Condyle Fracture during Revision of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Case Report and a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Sohrab Keyhani; Arash Sharafat Vaziri; Hossein Shafiei; Mohsen Mardani-Kivi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-04

6.  Does Donor Age of Nonirradiated Achilles Tendon Allograft Influence Mid-Term Results of Revision ACL Reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Marco Nitri; Luca Macchiarola; Federico Stefanelli; Gianandrea Lucidi; Alberto Grassi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2018-02-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.