BACKGROUND: The recent development of multiple targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has changed the treatment paradigm; hence the benefit and optimal timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy is being reevaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine primary tumor response to treatment with targeted agents in patients with mRCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic data of all mRCC patients seen at our institution between November 2004 and December 2009 without prior systemic treatment who received targeted therapy with their primary tumor in situ. MEASUREMENTS: Two independent reviewers measured the diameter of primary and metastatic tumors at baseline and subsequent scans, using Response Evaluation Criteria Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 to assess disease response. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 168 consecutive patients with a median 15 mo of follow-up and a median maximum tumor diameter of 9.6 cm. Median maximum primary tumor response was -7.1% (interquartile range: -14.0 to -0.1). A total of 61 patients had multiple studies available for evaluation. In 43 patients with <10% decrease in primary tumor within in the first 60 d, median maximum response was -7.2% at 154 d versus -24.5% maximum response at 174.5 d for 18 patients with ≥10% decrease in primary tumor during the initial 60 d. CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in primary tumor diameter >30% while on targeted therapy for mRCC is rare, with most patients demonstrating minimal or no decrease in primary tumor diameter. Early response predicts a better overall primary tumor response.
BACKGROUND: The recent development of multiple targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has changed the treatment paradigm; hence the benefit and optimal timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy is being reevaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine primary tumor response to treatment with targeted agents in patients with mRCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic data of all mRCC patients seen at our institution between November 2004 and December 2009 without prior systemic treatment who received targeted therapy with their primary tumor in situ. MEASUREMENTS: Two independent reviewers measured the diameter of primary and metastatic tumors at baseline and subsequent scans, using Response Evaluation Criteria Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 to assess disease response. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 168 consecutive patients with a median 15 mo of follow-up and a median maximum tumor diameter of 9.6 cm. Median maximum primary tumor response was -7.1% (interquartile range: -14.0 to -0.1). A total of 61 patients had multiple studies available for evaluation. In 43 patients with <10% decrease in primary tumor within in the first 60 d, median maximum response was -7.2% at 154 d versus -24.5% maximum response at 174.5 d for 18 patients with ≥10% decrease in primary tumor during the initial 60 d. CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in primary tumor diameter >30% while on targeted therapy for mRCC is rare, with most patients demonstrating minimal or no decrease in primary tumor diameter. Early response predicts a better overall primary tumor response.
Authors: R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Ricardo Sanchez-Ortiz; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Madhur M Merchant; Philippe E Spiess; Christopher G Wood Journal: Urology Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Chirag Amin; Eric Wallen; Raj S Pruthi; Benjamin F Calvo; Paul A Godley; W Kimryn Rathmell Journal: Urology Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Eric Jonasch; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin; Shi-Ming Tu; Lance C Pagliaro; Paul G Corn; Ana Aparicio; Pheroze Tamboli; Randall E Millikan; Xuemei Wang; John C Araujo; Wadih Arap; Nizar Tannir Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anil A Thomas; Brian I Rini; Brian R Lane; Jorge Garcia; Robert Dreicer; Eric A Klein; Andrew C Novick; Steven C Campbell Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-12-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jose A Karam; Catherine E Devine; Diana L Urbauer; Marisa Lozano; Tapati Maity; Kamran Ahrar; Pheroze Tamboli; Nizar M Tannir; Christopher G Wood Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ross J Mason; Lori Wood; Anil Kapoor; Naveen Basappa; George Bjarnason; Stephen A Boorjian; Rodney H Breau; Ilias Cagiannos; Michael A S Jewett; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Christian Kollmannsberger; Aly-Khan A Lalani; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Luke T Lavallée; Stephen Pautler; Nicholas Power; Patrick Richard; Alan So; Simon Tanguay; Ricardo A Rendon Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ricardo A Rendon; Anil Kapoor; Rodney Breau; Michael Leveridge; Andrew Feifer; Peter C Black; Alan So Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: P Papavassilis; L M Krabbe; B Thielen; M Bögemann; R Moritz; I Hoffmeister; L Hertle; E Herrmann Journal: Urologe A Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 0.639