Jose A Karam1, Catherine E Devine2, Diana L Urbauer3, Marisa Lozano1, Tapati Maity1, Kamran Ahrar4, Pheroze Tamboli5, Nizar M Tannir6, Christopher G Wood7. 1. Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 7. Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: CGWood@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a modest impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on primary renal tumors. Those studies were mostly retrospective or heterogeneous in their eligibility criteria with regard to histology, disease stage, duration of therapy, and time off therapy prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of axitinib in downsizing tumors in patients with nonmetastatic biopsy-proven clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-institution, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic biopsy-proven ccRCC were eligible. INTERVENTION: Patients received axitinib 5mg for up to 12 wk. Axitinib was continued until 36h prior to surgery. Patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy after axitinib therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was objective response rate prior to surgery. Secondary outcomes included safety, tolerability, and quality of life. A dedicated radiologist independently reviewed all computed tomography scans to evaluate for response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 24 patients were treated. Twenty-two patients continued axitinib for 12 wk; 1 patient continued axitinib for 11 wk and underwent surgery as planned. One patient stopped treatment at 7 wk due to adverse events (AEs). Median reduction of primary renal tumor diameter was 28.3%. Eleven patients experienced a partial response per RECIST; 13 had stable disease. There was no progression of disease while on axitinib. The most common AEs were hypertension, fatigue, oral mucositis, hypothyroidism, and hand-foot syndrome. Postoperatively, 2 grade 3 and 13 grade 2 complications were noted. No grade 4 or 5 complications occurred. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Specific Index-15 changed over time, with quality of life worsening while on therapy, but by week 19, it was not statistically different from screening. Limitations include single-arm design and small patient numbers. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib was clinically active and reasonably well tolerated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic ccRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this prospective clinical trial, we found that axitinib, when given prior to surgery, results in significant shrinking of kidney cancers. Larger studies are needed prior to further clinical use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01263769).
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a modest impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on primary renal tumors. Those studies were mostly retrospective or heterogeneous in their eligibility criteria with regard to histology, disease stage, duration of therapy, and time off therapy prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of axitinib in downsizing tumors in patients with nonmetastatic biopsy-proven clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-institution, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic biopsy-proven ccRCC were eligible. INTERVENTION: Patients received axitinib 5mg for up to 12 wk. Axitinib was continued until 36h prior to surgery. Patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy after axitinib therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was objective response rate prior to surgery. Secondary outcomes included safety, tolerability, and quality of life. A dedicated radiologist independently reviewed all computed tomography scans to evaluate for response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 24 patients were treated. Twenty-two patients continued axitinib for 12 wk; 1 patient continued axitinib for 11 wk and underwent surgery as planned. One patient stopped treatment at 7 wk due to adverse events (AEs). Median reduction of primary renal tumor diameter was 28.3%. Eleven patients experienced a partial response per RECIST; 13 had stable disease. There was no progression of disease while on axitinib. The most common AEs were hypertension, fatigue, oral mucositis, hypothyroidism, and hand-foot syndrome. Postoperatively, 2 grade 3 and 13 grade 2 complications were noted. No grade 4 or 5 complications occurred. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Specific Index-15 changed over time, with quality of life worsening while on therapy, but by week 19, it was not statistically different from screening. Limitations include single-arm design and small patient numbers. CONCLUSIONS:Axitinib was clinically active and reasonably well tolerated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic ccRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this prospective clinical trial, we found that axitinib, when given prior to surgery, results in significant shrinking of kidney cancers. Larger studies are needed prior to further clinical use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01263769).
Authors: Brian I Rini; Jorge Garcia; Paul Elson; Laura Wood; Shetal Shah; Andrew Stephenson; Mohammed Salem; Michael Gong; Amr Fergany; John Rabets; Jihad Kaouk; Venkatesh Krishnamurthi; Eric Klein; Robert Dreicer; Steven Campbell Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Thomas Powles; Christian Blank; Simon Chowdhury; Simon Horenblas; John Peters; Jonathan Shamash; Naveed Sarwar; Ekaterini Boleti; Anju Sahdev; Tim O'Brien; Dan Berney; Luis Beltran; Paul Nathan; John Haanen; Axel Bex Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Brian I Rini; Bernard Escudier; Piotr Tomczak; Andrey Kaprin; Cezary Szczylik; Thomas E Hutson; M Dror Michaelson; Vera A Gorbunova; Martin E Gore; Igor G Rusakov; Sylvie Negrier; Yen-Chuan Ou; Daniel Castellano; Ho Yeong Lim; Hirotsugu Uemura; Jamal Tarazi; David Cella; Connie Chen; Brad Rosbrook; Sinil Kim; Robert J Motzer Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jonathan L Silberstein; Frederick Millard; Reza Mehrazin; Ryan Kopp; Wassim Bazzi; Christopher J DiBlasio; Anthony L Patterson; Tracy M Downs; Furhan Yunus; Christopher J Kane; Ithaar H Derweesh Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Nicholas G Cost; Scott E Delacroix; Joshua P Sleeper; Paul J Smith; Ramy F Youssef; Brian F Chapin; Jose A Karam; Stephen Culp; E Jason Abel; James Brugarolas; Ganesh V Raj; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Christopher G Wood; Vitaly Margulis Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: C Seidel; M Fenner; A S Merseburger; C Reuter; P Ivanyi; F Länger; A Ganser; V Grünwald Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: E Jason Abel; Stephen H Culp; Nizar M Tannir; Surena F Matin; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Christopher G Wood Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Brian I Rini; Bohuslav Melichar; Takeshi Ueda; Viktor Grünwald; Mayer N Fishman; José A Arranz; Angel H Bair; Yazdi K Pithavala; Glen I Andrews; Dmitri Pavlov; Sinil Kim; Eric Jonasch Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lisly Chéry; Leonardo D Borregales; Bryan Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; Naveen Garg; Nathan Parker; Matthew H G Katz; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam Journal: Urology Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Jose A Karam; Catherine E Devine; Bryan M Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; E Jason Abel; Mohamad E Allaf; Axel Bex; Brian R Lane; R Houston Thompson; Christopher G Wood Journal: BJU Int Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Sebastien J Hotte; Anil Kapoor; Naveen S Basappa; Georg Bjarnason; Christina Canil; Henry J Conter; Piotr Czaykowski; Jeffrey Graham; Samantha Gray; Daniel Y C Heng; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Christian Kollmannsberger; Aly-Khan A Lalani; Scott A North; François Patenaude; Denis Soulières; Phillippe Violette; Eric Winquist; Lori A Wood; Shaan Dudani; Ranjena Maloni; M Neil Reaume Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Justin D Oake; Premal Patel; Luke T Lavallée; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Olli Saarela; Laurence Klotz; Ronald B Moore; Anil Kapoor; Antonio Finelli; Ricardo A Rendon; Jun Kawakami; Alan I So; Darrel E Drachenberg Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 1.862