Axel Bex1, John Haanen. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, a.bex@nki.nl.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In the era of targeted therapy, management of patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma and the tumour in place is again under investigation in randomized controlled trials. Proper patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) remains challenging. Presurgical targeted therapy may have potential advantages in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on CN and presurgical targeted therapy were reviewed in the literature. RESULTS: Despite validated prognostic scores, outcome after CN is additionally influenced by factors impacting on surgical morbidity and mortality. Patient age, comorbidity, tumour size and extent, metastatic load, surgical approach and skills are not well represented by current prognostic models.The strongest predictor of poor survival following CN is progression within 90 days of surgery. A period of presurgical targeted therapy may identify those patients with rapid disease progression prior to a planned nephrectomy or metastasectomy from which they may not benefit. In nonrandomized prospective studies of presurgical therapy, up to 26 % of patients progressed at metastatic sites prior to planned surgery. Those with intermediate risk and absence of progression had a more than 70% probability to survive 2 years or longer after CN. CONCLUSION: In the absence of biomarkers, presurgical therapy may contribute to individualizing treatment decisions. The advantages and disadvantages of this concept are investigated in a randomized EORTC trial of upfront CN versus CN after presurgical sunitinib in the absence of progression.
INTRODUCTION: In the era of targeted therapy, management of patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma and the tumour in place is again under investigation in randomized controlled trials. Proper patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) remains challenging. Presurgical targeted therapy may have potential advantages in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on CN and presurgical targeted therapy were reviewed in the literature. RESULTS: Despite validated prognostic scores, outcome after CN is additionally influenced by factors impacting on surgical morbidity and mortality. Patient age, comorbidity, tumour size and extent, metastatic load, surgical approach and skills are not well represented by current prognostic models.The strongest predictor of poor survival following CN is progression within 90 days of surgery. A period of presurgical targeted therapy may identify those patients with rapid disease progression prior to a planned nephrectomy or metastasectomy from which they may not benefit. In nonrandomized prospective studies of presurgical therapy, up to 26 % of patients progressed at metastatic sites prior to planned surgery. Those with intermediate risk and absence of progression had a more than 70% probability to survive 2 years or longer after CN. CONCLUSION: In the absence of biomarkers, presurgical therapy may contribute to individualizing treatment decisions. The advantages and disadvantages of this concept are investigated in a randomized EORTC trial of upfront CN versus CN after presurgical sunitinib in the absence of progression.
Authors: R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Toni K Choueiri; Wanling Xie; Christian Kollmannsberger; Scott North; Jennifer J Knox; J Geoffrey Lampard; David F McDermott; Brian I Rini; Daniel Y C Heng Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Nicholas J Hellenthal; Willie Underwood; Remedios Penetrante; Alan Litwin; Shaozeng Zhang; Gregory E Wilding; Bin T Teh; Hyung L Kim Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Stephen H Culp; Nizar M Tannir; E Jason Abel; Vitaly Margulis; Pheroze Tamboli; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E Jason Abel; Stephen H Culp; Nizar M Tannir; Pheroze Tamboli; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Ricardo Sanchez-Ortiz; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Madhur M Merchant; Philippe E Spiess; Christopher G Wood Journal: Urology Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Eric Jonasch; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin; Shi-Ming Tu; Lance C Pagliaro; Paul G Corn; Ana Aparicio; Pheroze Tamboli; Randall E Millikan; Xuemei Wang; John C Araujo; Wadih Arap; Nizar Tannir Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Javier Puente Vázquez; T Alonso Gordoa; J Moreno; L Poma; E Diaz Rubio; A Gomez; J Blazquez; J L Gonzalez Larriba Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2015-03
Authors: John M L Ebos; Michalis Mastri; Christina R Lee; Amanda Tracz; John M Hudson; Kristopher Attwood; William R Cruz-Munoz; Christopher Jedeszko; Peter Burns; Robert S Kerbel Journal: EMBO Mol Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 12.137