Literature DB >> 20950282

Cortical-evoked potentials reflect speech-in-noise perception in children.

Samira Anderson1, Bharath Chandrasekaran, Han-Gyol Yi, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Children are known to be particularly vulnerable to the effects of noise on speech perception, and it is commonly acknowledged that failure of central auditory processes can lead to these difficulties with speech-in-noise (SIN) perception. However, little is known about the mechanistic relationship between central processes and the perception of SIN. Our aims were twofold: to examine the effects of noise on the central encoding of speech through measurement of cortical event-related potentials and to examine the relationship between cortical processing and behavioral indices of SIN perception. We recorded cortical responses to the speech syllable [da] in quiet and multi-talker babble noise in 32 children with a broad range of SIN perception. Outcomes suggest inordinate effects of noise on auditory function in the bottom SIN perceivers compared with the top perceivers. The cortical amplitudes in the top SIN group remained stable between conditions, whereas amplitudes increased significantly in the bottom SIN group, suggesting a developmental central processing impairment in the bottom perceivers that may contribute to difficulties in encoding and perceiving speech in challenging listening environments.
© 2010 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2010 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20950282      PMCID: PMC3005124          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07409.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  47 in total

1.  Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; B Kwong; M Don
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  J Cunningham; T Nicol; S G Zecker; A Bradlow; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems.

Authors:  Erin A Hayes; Catherine M Warrier; Trent G Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The relationship between brainstem temporal processing and performance on tests of central auditory function in children with reading disorders.

Authors:  Cassandra R Billiet; Teri James Bellis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Children's auditory event-related potentials index sound complexity and "speechness".

Authors:  R Ceponiene; A Shestakova; P Balan; P Alku; K Yiaguchi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.292

8.  Dichotic listening performance and frontal lobe function.

Authors:  Kenneth Hugdahl; Thomas Bodner; Elisabeth Weiss; Thomas Benke
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-03

9.  Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Rita Ceponiene; Teemu Rinne; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  11 in total

1.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Childhood leukemia survivors exhibit deficiencies in sensory and cognitive processes, as reflected by event-related brain potentials after completion of curative chemotherapy: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Kelin M Brace; Wei Wei Lee; Peter D Cole; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

Review 4.  Aphasia and Auditory Processing after Stroke through an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Lens.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Iruni Wanigasekara; Oscar M Cañete; Celia Moore; Clare M McCann
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-08

5.  Impaired auditory processing and neural representation of speech in noise among symptomatic post-concussion adults.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Auditory brainstem measures predict reading and speech-in-noise perception in school-aged children.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Steve Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Auditory event-related potentials and function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Thierry Morlet; Kyoko Nagao; L Ashleigh Greenwood; R Matthew Cardinale; Rebecca G Gaffney; Tammy Riegner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Background noise can enhance cortical auditory evoked potentials under certain conditions.

Authors:  Melissa A Papesh; Curtis J Billings; Lucas S Baltzell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Hearing Aids Do Not Alter Cortical Entrainment to Speech at Audible Levels in Mild-to-Moderately Hearing-Impaired Subjects.

Authors:  Frederique J Vanheusden; Mikolaj Kegler; Katie Ireland; Constantina Georga; David M Simpson; Tobias Reichenbach; Steven L Bell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of age-related hearing loss and background noise on neuromagnetic activity from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Anja Roye; Claire Salloum
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.