Literature DB >> 20948438

Adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T cells results in sustained clinical responses in patients with locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Chrystal U Louis1, Karin Straathof, Catherine M Bollard, Sravya Ennamuri, Claudia Gerken, Teresita T Lopez, M Helen Huls, Andrea Sheehan, Meng-Fen Wu, Hao Liu, Adrian Gee, Malcolm K Brenner, Cliona M Rooney, Helen E Heslop, Stephen Gottschalk.   

Abstract

Patients with recurrent or refractory Epstein Barr Virus (EBV)-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) continue to have poor outcomes. Our earlier Phase I dose escalation clinical study of 10 NPC patients showed that infusion of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells (EBV-CTLs) was safe and had antitumor activity. To better define the overall response rate and discover whether disease status, EBV-antigen specificity, and/or in vivo expansion of infused EBV-CTLs predicted outcome, we treated 13 additional NPC patients with EBV-CTLs in a fixed-dose, Phase II component of the study. We assessed toxicity, efficacy, specificity, and expansion of infused CTLs for all 23 recurrent/refractory NPC patients treated on this Phase I/II clinical study. At the time of CTL infusion, 8 relapsed NPC patients were in remission and 15 had active disease. No significant toxicity was observed. Of the relapsed patients treated in their second or subsequent remission, 62% (5/8) remain disease free (at 17 to 75 mo), whereas 48.7% (7/15) of those with active disease had a CR/CRu (33.3%) or PR (15.4%). In contrast to locoregional disease, metastatic disease was associated with an increased risk of disease progression (HR: 3.91, P=0.015) and decreased overall survival (HR: 5.55, P=0.022). Neither the specificity of the infused CTLs for particular EBV antigens nor their measurable in vivo expansion discernibly influenced outcome. In conclusion, treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory EBV-positive NPC with EBV-CTLs is safe and can be associated with significant, long-term clinical benefit, particularly for patients with locoregional disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20948438      PMCID: PMC2964409          DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181f3cbf4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother        ISSN: 1524-9557            Impact factor:   4.456


  40 in total

Review 1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: treatments and outcomes in the 20th century.

Authors:  R F Mould; T H P Tai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  A T C Chan; P M L Teo; P J Johnson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  An Epstein-Barr virus deletion mutant associated with fatal lymphoproliferative disease unresponsive to therapy with virus-specific CTLs.

Authors:  S Gottschalk; C Y Ng; M Perez; C A Smith; C Sample; M K Brenner; H E Heslop; C M Rooney
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Chemotherapy induces lytic EBV replication and confers ganciclovir susceptibility to EBV-positive epithelial cell tumors.

Authors:  Wen-hai Feng; Bruce Israel; Nancy Raab-Traub; Pierre Busson; Shannon C Kenney
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of NPC.

Authors:  Nancy Raab-Traub
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 7.  Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases.

Authors:  R Khanna; S R Burrows
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

8.  A Phase II trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  J S McCarthy; I F Tannock; P Degendorfer; T Panzarella; M Furlan; L L Siu
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.337

9.  Clinical application of tumor volume in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma to predict outcome.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Tze-Ta Huang; Moon-Sing Lee; Shih-Hsuan Hsiao; Hon-Yi Lin; Yu-Chieh Su; Feng-Chun Hsu; Shih-Kai Hung
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Combination gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a phase II study.

Authors:  R K C Ngan; H H Y Yiu; W H Lau; S Yau; F Y Cheung; T M Chan; C H Kwok; C Y Chiu; S K Au; W Foo; C K Law; K C Tse
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  81 in total

1.  Generation of polyclonal CMV-specific T cells for the adoptive immunotherapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alexia Ghazi; Aidin Ashoori; Patrick J Hanley; Vita S Brawley; Donald R Shaffer; Yvonne Kew; Suzanne Z Powell; Robert Grossman; Zakaria Grada; Michael E Scheurer; Meenakshi Hegde; Ann M Leen; Catherine M Bollard; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop; Stephen Gottschalk; Nabil Ahmed
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 2.  Adoptive T-Cell Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen Gottschalk; Cliona M Rooney
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Adoptive Immunotherapy with Antigen-Specific T Cells Expressing a Native TCR.

Authors:  Wingchi Leung; Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.151

4.  Combining drugs and biologics to treat nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Cytotoxic T cell adoptive immunotherapy as a treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Viviana P Lutzky; Pauline Crooks; Leanne Morrison; Natasha Stevens; Joanne E Davis; Monika Corban; David Hall; Benedict Panizza; William B Coman; Scott Coman; Denis J Moss
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 6.  T lymphocytes targeting native receptors.

Authors:  Cliona M Rooney; Ann M Leen; Juan F Vera; Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 7.  Exploiting the curative potential of adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Christian S Hinrichs; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 8.  Strategies for enhancing adoptive T-cell immunotherapy against solid tumors using engineered cytokine signaling and other modalities.

Authors:  Thomas Shum; Robert L Kruse; Cliona M Rooney
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.388

9.  Adenovirus-based vaccines against rhesus lymphocryptovirus EBNA-1 induce expansion of specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in persistently infected rhesus macaques.

Authors:  R Leskowitz; M H Fogg; X Y Zhou; A Kaur; E L V Silveira; F Villinger; P M Lieberman; F Wang; H C Ertl
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Gastric adenocarcinoma microRNA profiles in fixed tissue and in plasma reveal cancer-associated and Epstein-Barr virus-related expression patterns.

Authors:  Amanda L Treece; Daniel L Duncan; Weihua Tang; Sandra Elmore; Douglas R Morgan; Ricardo L Dominguez; Olga Speck; Michael O Meyers; Margaret L Gulley
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.662

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.