Literature DB >> 20947444

New adjustable gastric bands available in the United States: a comparative study.

Jaime Ponce1, Brooke Lindsey, Sharin Pritchett, Michele Bleech, Kris Marlowe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New gastric bands have been available for the past 3 years in the United States: Lap-Band AP (LBAP), Realize Band (RB), and Realize Band C (RBC). No RBC data have been previously published. The objective of the present study was to report our experience with 3 newer gastric bands in an experienced, private, U.S. bariatric surgery center.
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics evaluated include age, body mass index (BMI), gender, percentage of excess weight loss, band fill volumes, and complications.
RESULTS: From April 2007 through February 2010, 633 patients (mean age 42.3 ± 10.3 years) underwent laparoscopic band placement. The LBAP was placed in 384 patients (78% women, BMI 45.4 ± 6.9 kg/m(2)), the RB in 167 patients (84% women, BMI 46.4 ± 7.9), and the RBC in 82 patients (76% women, BMI 46.1 ± 8.2). The corresponding mean 1-year percentage of excess weight loss was 44.4% ± 19%, 38.9% ± 16.2%, and 32.1% ± 16.1% (LBAP versus RB and RBC, P <.05), with a 91%, 90%, and 83% follow-up rate. The 2-year percentage of excess weight loss for the LBAP and RB patients was 52.5 ± 21.2 and 43.3 ± 21.3 (P <.05), respectively, with a 76% and 67% follow-up rate. The corresponding mean band volumes at 1 year were 4.6, 7.6, and 10.2 mL, with 2%, 12%, and 38% of the bands filled more than the manufacturer's maximal volume capacity recommendation. The postoperative complications included slippages and erosions in .5% and .5% of the LBAP, .6% and 1.8% of the RB, and 1.2% and 0% of the RBC patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Of the new bands available in the United States, the LBAP provided significantly better weight loss in our private practice setting. The RBC patients had the least weight loss, with a high band-fill volume needed to achieve effective restriction. Copyright Â
© 2011 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947444     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  6 in total

1.  The Pattern of Adjustments after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band.

Authors:  Richard S Flint; Grant Coulter; Ross Roberts
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Impact of lap-band size on weight loss: does gender matter?

Authors:  Ali Ardestani; Ardalan Tangestanipoor; Malcolm K Robinson; David B Lautz; Ashley H Vernon; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Evaluation of the Swedish adjustable gastric band VC (SAGB-VC) in an Australian population: early results.

Authors:  Jennifer B Keogh; Anthony Brancatisano; Sue F Taylor; Fiona McDonald; Roy Brancatisano; Jeffrey M Hamdorf; Jacob Chisholm; Lillian Kow; Sara Wahlroos; Brendan Ryan; Jim Toouli
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  abiliti Closed-Loop Gastric Electrical Stimulation System for Treatment of Obesity: Clinical Results with a 27-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  T Horbach; A Thalheimer; F Seyfried; F Eschenbacher; P Schuhmann; G Meyer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Asymptomatic Gastric Band Erosion Detected during Routine Gastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Gee Young Yun; Woo Sub Kim; Hye Jin Kim; Sun Hyung Kang; Hee Seok Moon; Jae Kyu Sung; Hyun Yong Jeong
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-02-11

6.  Morbid obesity-the new pandemic: medical and surgical management, and implications for the practicing gastroenterologist.

Authors:  John P Cello; Stanley J Rogers
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.488

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.