Literature DB >> 25832985

The Pattern of Adjustments after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band.

Richard S Flint1,2, Grant Coulter3, Ross Roberts3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is dependent on gradual adjustments over time. The aim of this study is to describe that pattern of LAGB adjustments that are required after surgery.
METHODS: A non-randomized observational study of consecutive LAGB from a single practise. Patients were sourced from a prospective database. Details of each LAGB adjustment were recorded along with weight loss and complications.
RESULTS: There were 125 consecutive LAGB between March 2009 and September 2011 (mean age 46.6 ± 11.9 years; 113 female, BMI 42.1 ± 5.9 kg/m(2)). The mean %EBWL was 41.4 ± 19.1 % at 2 years. There was a total of 746 band adjustments with mean 7.1 ± 4.4 per patient. Approximately, a third of patients (34 %) reached optimal volume within 6 months but 49 patients (39 %) still required adjustments beyond a year. Weight loss was maximal prior to the first adjustment (41 % of mean total weight loss). The rate of weight loss decreased down to 1-3 %EBWL between later fills despite repeated increases in band volume. Urgent deflations were required in 63 patients with 24 of these patients having multiple overfills. There were two patients who had gastric prolapse but no other LAGB-related complications occurred in the first 2 years after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: LAGB requires a considerable postoperative commitment that may take several months. Overfills are common and may be the result of a false perception that tightening the band will hasten weight loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band; Obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832985     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1637-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  17 in total

1.  Recommendations for reporting weight loss.

Authors:  Marvyn Deitel; Robert J Greenstein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Johnathan A Slone; Xuan-Mai T Nguyen; Jaimee S Hartman; David B Hoyt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Effects of gastric band adjustments on intraluminal pressure.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Melissa Richards; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Bruce D Schirmer; Daniel B Jones; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen; Ryan P Merkow; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years.

Authors:  Jacques Himpens; Giovanni Dapri; Guy Bernard Cadière
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  New adjustable gastric bands available in the United States: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jaime Ponce; Brooke Lindsey; Sharin Pritchett; Michele Bleech; Kris Marlowe
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at a U.S. center with up to 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Richard B Rubenstein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Postoperative management of laparoscopic gastric banding.

Authors:  Luca Busetto; Gianni Segato; Francesco De Marchi; Mirto Foletto; Maurizio De Luca; Franco Favretti; Giuliano Enzi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Patient management after LAP-BAND placement.

Authors:  Franco Favretti; Paul E O'Brien; John B Dixon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  US experience with the LAP-BAND system.

Authors:  Christine J Ren; Santiago Horgan; Jaime Ponce
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  1 in total

1.  It is really time to retire laparoscopic gastric banding? Positive outcomes after long-term follow-up: the management is the key.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Lucido; Giuseppe Scognamiglio; Giusiana Nesta; Gianmattia Del Genio; Stefano Cristiano; Francesco Pizza; Salvatore Tolone; Luigi Brusciano; Simona Parisi; Stefano Pagnotta; Claudio Gambardella
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.