Literature DB >> 20945188

A double dissociation between linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relationships.

D Kemmerer1, D Tranel.   

Abstract

This paper explores from a neuropsychological perspective the relation between the meanings of English locative prepositions (e.g., in, on, above, below) and the kinds of representations that are used for many visuospatial processes such as recognising, drawing, and constructing spatially complex objects. One possibility that has been proposed by some psycholinguists is that the meanings of prepositions are the same as the representations used in these other processes. An alternative possibility, which has been proposed by a different group of researchers, is that the relation is more distant such that the meanings of prepositions constitute language-specific semantic structures that are distinct from the representations that underlie many visuospatial abilities. Here we report a detailed assessment of the linguistic as well as perceptual and cognitive representations of spatial relationships in two brain-damaged subjects. Four tests were administered that involve both the production and comprehension of English locative prepositions. In addition, four standardised neuropsychological tests that probe high-level nonlinguistic visuospatial perception and cognition were administered. Case 1 was significantly impaired on all of the preposition tests but was normal on all of the visuospatial tests. In striking contrast, Case 2 was normal on all of the preposition tests but was significantly impaired on all of the visuospatial tests. The subjects also had entirely different brain lesions: Case 1 had a left-hemisphere lesion in the frontoparietal region, and Case 2 had a right-hemisphere lesion in the frontoparietal and temporal regions. Together, the results constitute a "double dissociation," suggesting that the preposition tests and the visuospatial tests require cognitively and neurally distinct mechanisms that can be disrupted independently of each other. We interpret the data as supporting the second possibility described-namely, that the meanings of locative prepositions may be language-specific semantic structures that are separate from the mental representations underlying many other kinds of high-level nonlinguistic visuospatial abilities.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 20945188     DOI: 10.1080/026432900410766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  Interpreting spatial language in image captions.

Authors:  Mark M Hall; Philip D Smart; Christopher B Jones
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-12-14

3.  The nature of categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing: An interference study.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Gregoire Borst
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-10-06

4.  Deconstructing events: the neural bases for space, time, and causality.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec; Eileen R Cardillo; Gwenda L Schmidt; Matthew Lehet; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Individual differences in spatial relation processing: effects of strategy, ability, and gender.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Gregoire Borst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Bilateral parietal contributions to spatial language.

Authors:  Julie Conder; Julius Fridriksson; Gordon C Baylis; Cameron M Smith; Timothy W Boiteau; Amit Almor
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Naming and gesturing spatial relations: evidence from focal brain-injured individuals.

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Matthew Lehet; Katsiaryna Malykhina; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Language, perception, and the schematic representation of spatial relations.

Authors:  Prin Amorapanth; Alexander Kranjec; Bianca Bromberger; Matthew Lehet; Page Widick; Adam J Woods; Daniel Y Kimberg; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Are temporal concepts embodied? A challenge for cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-31

10.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.