Literature DB >> 22070948

Language, perception, and the schematic representation of spatial relations.

Prin Amorapanth1, Alexander Kranjec, Bianca Bromberger, Matthew Lehet, Page Widick, Adam J Woods, Daniel Y Kimberg, Anjan Chatterjee.   

Abstract

Schemas are abstract nonverbal representations that parsimoniously depict spatial relations. Despite their ubiquitous use in maps and diagrams, little is known about their neural instantiation. We sought to determine the extent to which schematic representations are neurally distinguished from language on the one hand, and from rich perceptual representations on the other. In patients with either left hemisphere damage or right hemisphere damage, a battery of matching tasks depicting categorical spatial relations was used to probe for the comprehension of basic spatial concepts across distinct representational formats (words, pictures, and schemas). Left hemisphere patients underperformed right hemisphere patients across all tasks. However, focused residual analyses using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) suggest that (1) left hemisphere deficits in the representation of categorical spatial relations are difficult to distinguish from deficits in naming these relations and (2) the right hemisphere plays a special role in extracting schematic representations from richly textured pictures. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22070948      PMCID: PMC3299879          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.781


  17 in total

1.  Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations.

Authors:  H Damasio; T J Grabowski; D Tranel; L L Ponto; R D Hichwa; A R Damasio
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Language and space: some interactions.

Authors:  A Chatterjee
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Hanna Damasio; Stephen McCullough; Thomas Grabowski; Laura L B Ponto; Richard D Hichwa; Ursula Bellugi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions.

Authors:  Daniel Tranel; David Kemmerer
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Neural correlates of locative prepositions.

Authors:  Matthijs L Noordzij; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Nick F Ramsey; Albert Postma
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; O Koenig; A Barrett; C B Cave; J Tang; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Intuitions about support in 4.5-month-old infants.

Authors:  A Needham; R Baillargeon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-05

8.  Production and comprehension of prepositions in aphasia.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Understanding spatial relations: flexible infants, lexical adults.

Authors:  Laraine McDonough; Soonja Choi; Jean M Mandler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives.

Authors:  J M Mandler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  11 in total

1.  The neural correlates for spatial language: Perspective-dependent and -independent relationships in American Sign Language and spoken English.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Chris Brozdowski; Stephen McCullough
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Behavioral and Neural Representations of Spatial Directions across Words, Schemas, and Images.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Steven A Marchette; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The biology of linguistic expression impacts neural correlates for spatial language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Laura L B Ponto; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Spontaneous gesture and spatial language: Evidence from focal brain injury.

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Matthew Lehet; Katsiaryna Malykhina; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Naming and gesturing spatial relations: evidence from focal brain-injured individuals.

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Matthew Lehet; Katsiaryna Malykhina; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Neural bases of action abstraction.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Yune-Sang Lee; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Fronto-temporal regions encode the manner of motion in spatial language.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Eileen R Cardillo; Alexander Kranjec; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Spatial direction comprehension in images, arrows, and words in two patients with posterior cortical atrophy.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Eileen R Cardillo; Bianca Bromberger; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-26

10.  Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec; Gary Lupyan; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.