Literature DB >> 21861674

Deconstructing events: the neural bases for space, time, and causality.

Alexander Kranjec1, Eileen R Cardillo, Gwenda L Schmidt, Matthew Lehet, Anjan Chatterjee.   

Abstract

Space, time, and causality provide a natural structure for organizing our experience. These abstract categories allow us to think relationally in the most basic sense; understanding simple events requires one to represent the spatial relations among objects, the relative durations of actions or movements, and the links between causes and effects. The present fMRI study investigates the extent to which the brain distinguishes between these fundamental conceptual domains. Participants performed a 1-back task with three conditions of interest (space, time, and causality). Each condition required comparing relations between events in a simple verbal narrative. Depending on the condition, participants were instructed to either attend to the spatial, temporal, or causal characteristics of events, but between participants each particular event relation appeared in all three conditions. Contrasts compared neural activity during each condition against the remaining two and revealed how thinking about events is deconstructed neurally. Space trials recruited neural areas traditionally associated with visuospatial processing, primarily bilateral frontal and occipitoparietal networks. Causality trials activated areas previously found to underlie causal thinking and thematic role assignment, such as left medial frontal and left middle temporal gyri, respectively. Causality trials also produced activations in SMA, caudate, and cerebellum; cortical and subcortical regions associated with the perception of time at different timescales. The time contrast, however, produced no significant effects. This pattern, indicating negative results for time trials but positive effects for causality trials in areas important for time perception, motivated additional overlap analyses to further probe relations between domains. The results of these analyses suggest a closer correspondence between time and causality than between time and space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861674      PMCID: PMC3636508          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  64 in total

1.  Language and space: some interactions.

Authors:  A Chatterjee
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  How the brain processes causal inferences in text.

Authors:  Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-01

3.  Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions.

Authors:  Daniel Tranel; David Kemmerer
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fugelsang; Matthew E Roser; Paul M Corballis; Michael S Gazzaniga; Kevin N Dunbar
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-19

5.  The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; E Zarahn; M D'esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions.

Authors:  E Zarahn; G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Disembodying cognition.

Authors:  Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Lang Cogn       Date:  2010-05

9.  Dissociable neural systems for timing: evidence from subjects with basal ganglia lesions.

Authors:  H Branch Coslett; Martin Wiener; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prescribed spatial prepositions influence how we think about time.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec; Eileen R Cardillo; Gwenda L Schmidt; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-10-28
View more
  6 in total

1.  Concept Representation Reflects Multimodal Abstraction: A Framework for Embodied Semantics.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandino; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai; Suzanne L Pendl; Colin J Humphries; William L Gross; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Rethinking actions: implementation and association.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-09-09

3.  The grounding of temporal metaphors.

Authors:  Vicky T Lai; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Involvement of the mentalizing network in social and non-social high construal.

Authors:  Kris Baetens; Ning Ma; Johan Steen; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Conceptual art made simple for neuroaesthetics.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Neural Correlates of Causal Inferences in Discourse Understanding and Logical Problem-Solving: A Meta-Analysis Study.

Authors:  Wangshu Feng; Weijuan Wang; Jia Liu; Zhen Wang; Lingyun Tian; Lin Fan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.