Literature DB >> 20945148

[Perspectives of the digital mammography platform].

R Gruber1, C C Riedl, M Reisegger, K Pinker, E Sturm, F Semturs, T H Helbich.   

Abstract

In Europe one out of every nine women suffers from breast cancer during her lifetime. Since the introduction of mammography screening programs more breast cancers are being diagnosed when they are still small and early stage cancers with a favourable prognosis. The introduction of digital mammography systems has led to a continuous reduction of breast cancer mortality especially in specific patient subgroups. Furthermore, the digital mammography platform enables the development of new, innovative breast imaging methods to increase sensitivity and decrease breast cancer mortality. This digital mammography platform includes digital breast tomosynthesis, digital contrast medium mammography and digital contrast medium breast tomosynthesis as well as fused data sets from digital mammography with ultrasound or MRI. The following article summarizes these new applications, describes the strengths of the digital platform and illustrates the potential advantages of an improved breast cancer diagnosis by digital mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20945148     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-010-2010-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  40 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

3.  Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara C Chen; Ann-Katherine Carton; Michael Albert; Emily F Conant; Mitchell D Schnall; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility.

Authors:  Hans Bornefalk; John M Lewin; Mats Danielsson; Mats Lundqvist
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Digital mammography: novel applications.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Authors:  J M Lewin; R E Hendrick; C J D'Orsi; P K Isaacs; L J Moss; A Karellas; G A Sisney; C C Kuni; G R Cutter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?

Authors:  J P Westerhof; U Fischer; J D Moritz; J W Oestmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs.

Authors:  E R Miller; E M McCurry; B Hruska
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos; Gordon S Abrams; Cathy Cohen; Christiane M Hakim; Jules H Sumkin; John Drescher; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.