Literature DB >> 20939100

Computational modeling of laminin N-terminal domains using sparse distance constraints from disulfide bonds and chemical cross-linking.

Stefan Kalkhof1, Sebastian Haehn, Mats Paulsson, Neil Smyth, Jens Meiler, Andrea Sinz.   

Abstract

Basement membranes are thin extracellular protein layers, which separate endothelial and epithelial cells from the underlying connecting tissue. The main noncollagenous components of basement membranes are laminins, trimeric glycoproteins, which form polymeric networks by interactions of their N-terminal (LN) domains; however, no high-resolution structure of laminin LN domains exists so far. To construct models for laminin β(1) and γ(1) LN domains, 14 potentially suited template structures were determined using fold recognition methods. For each target/template-combination comparative models were created with Rosetta. Final models were selected based on their agreement with experimentally obtained distance constraints from natural cross-links, that is, disulfide bonds as well as chemical cross-links obtained from reactions with two amine-reactive cross-linkers. We predict that laminin β(1) and γ(1) LN domains share the galactose-binding domain-like fold.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20939100      PMCID: PMC5079110          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  85 in total

1.  Solution structure of the single-strand break repair protein XRCC1 N-terminal domain.

Authors:  A Marintchev; M A Mullen; M W Maciejewski; B Pan; M R Gryk; G P Mullen
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-09

2.  Crystal structure of the C-type lectin-like domain from the human hematopoietic cell receptor CD69.

Authors:  A S Llera; F Viedma; F Sánchez-Madrid; J Tormo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Different length peptides bind to HLA-Aw68 similarly at their ends but bulge out in the middle.

Authors:  H C Guo; T S Jardetzky; T P Garrett; W S Lane; J L Strominger; D C Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Marco Bortolus; Ahmad Al-Mestarihi; Hassane Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server.

Authors:  Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Sisyphus and prediction of protein structure.

Authors:  B Rost; S O'Donoghue
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1997-08

7.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic data of the major albumin from Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC.

Authors:  S M Dayan; A Van Donkelaar; A A Kortt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Mutations in Lama1 disrupt retinal vascular development and inner limiting membrane formation.

Authors:  Malia M Edwards; Elmina Mammadova-Bach; Fabien Alpy; Annick Klein; Wanda L Hicks; Michel Roux; Patricia Simon-Assmann; Richard S Smith; Gertraud Orend; Jiang Wu; Neal S Peachey; Jürgen K Naggert; Olivier Lefebvre; Patsy M Nishina
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

1.  StavroX--a software for analyzing crosslinked products in protein interaction studies.

Authors:  Michael Götze; Jens Pettelkau; Sabine Schaks; Konstanze Bosse; Christian H Ihling; Fabian Krauth; Romy Fritzsche; Uwe Kühn; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Probing the conformation of the ISWI ATPase domain with genetically encoded photoreactive crosslinkers and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ignasi Forné; Johanna Ludwigsen; Axel Imhof; Peter B Becker; Felix Mueller-Planitz
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Structural analysis of guanylyl cyclase-activating protein-2 (GCAP-2) homodimer by stable isotope-labeling, chemical cross-linking, and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jens Pettelkau; Iris Thondorf; Stephan Theisgen; Hauke Lilie; Thomas Schröder; Christian Arlt; Christian H Ihling; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  A Novel MS-Cleavable Azo Cross-Linker for Peptide Structure Analysis by Free Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing (FRIPS).

Authors:  Claudio Iacobucci; Christoph Hage; Mathias Schäfer; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Novel Concepts of MS-Cleavable Cross-linkers for Improved Peptide Structure Analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Hage; Francesco Falvo; Mathias Schäfer; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Automated assignment of MS/MS cleavable cross-links in protein 3D-structure analysis.

Authors:  Michael Götze; Jens Pettelkau; Romy Fritzsche; Christian H Ihling; Mathias Schäfer; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Crystal structure of the ligand binding domain of netrin G2.

Authors:  Julia Brasch; Oliver J Harrison; Goran Ahlsen; Qun Liu; Lawrence Shapiro
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Protein structure prediction guided by crosslinking restraints--A systematic evaluation of the impact of the crosslinking spacer length.

Authors:  Tommy Hofmann; Axel W Fischer; Jens Meiler; Stefan Kalkhof
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Accounting for Neighboring Residue Hydrophobicity in Diethylpyrocarbonate Labeling Mass Spectrometry Improves Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Sarah E Biehn; Danielle M Picarello; Xiao Pan; Richard W Vachet; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Crystal structures of the network-forming short-arm tips of the laminin β1 and γ1 chains.

Authors:  Federico Carafoli; Sadaf-Ahmahni Hussain; Erhard Hohenester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.