Literature DB >> 20937723

Remote magnetic navigation with irrigated tip catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Shinsuke Miyazaki1, Ashok J Shah, Olivier Xhaët, Nicolas Derval, Seiichiro Matsuo, Matthew Wright, Isabelle Nault, Andrei Forclaz, Amir S Jadidi, Sébastien Knecht, Lena Rivard, Xingpeng Liu, Nick Linton, Frédéric Sacher, Mélèze Hocini, Pierre Jaïs, Michel Haïssaguerre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The remote magnetic navigation system (MNS) has been used with a nonirrigated magnetic catheter for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of the newly available irrigated tip magnetic catheter for index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between January 2008 and June 2009, 30 consecutive patients with drug-resistant PAF underwent circular mapping catheter-guided PVI with MNS (MNS group). The outcomes were compared retrospectively with those of a conventional hand-controlled ablation technique during the same period in 44 consecutive patients (manual group). All 4 pulmonary veins were successfully isolated in both groups except in 4 patients in the MNS group. Radiofrequency and procedure duration were higher in the MNS group (60 ± 27 versus 43 ± 16 minutes; P = 0.0019) than in the manual group (246 ± 50 versus 153 ± 51 minutes; P < 0.0001). In the patients who underwent only PVI, total fluoroscopic time also was longer in the MNS group than in the manual group (58 ± 24 versus 40 ± 14 minutes; P = 0.0002). At 12-month follow-up after a single procedure, 69.0% of the patients in MNS group and 61.8% of patients in manual group were free of atrial tachyarrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs. There was no significant difference in the atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival between the 2 groups (P = 0.961). Cardiac tamponade occurred in 1 patient in the manual group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PAF, MNS-guided PVI with the newly available irrigated tip magnetic catheter backed up with manual ablation whenever required is feasible. However, it requires longer ablation, fluoroscopy, and procedural times than the conventional approach in the early experience stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937723     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.957803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  27 in total

Review 1.  Irrigated-Tip Magnetic Catheter Ablation Of AF: ALong-Term Prospective Study In 130 Patients.

Authors:  Julian Chun
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2011-07-15

2.  Magnetically guided irrigated gold-tip catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation--techniques, procedural parameters and outcome.

Authors:  Bogdan Muntean; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Johannes Heintze; Jürgen Vogt; Dieter Horstkotte; Georg Nölker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: single-catheter technique or additional use of a circular mapping catheter?

Authors:  Dirk Vollmann; Lars Lüthje; Joachim Seegers; Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Jan Sohns; Christian Röver; Gerd Hasenfuß; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Role of Preprocedural Imaging in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Jakob Lüker; Arian Sultan; Boris Hoffmann; Benjamin Schäffer; Doreen Schreiber; Özge Akbulak; Stephan Willems; And Daniel Steven
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 5.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

6.  Magnetic guidance versus manual control: comparison of radiofrequency lesion dimensions and evaluation of the effect of heart wall motion in a myocardial phantom.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhaskaran; M A Tony Barry; Sara I Al Raisi; William Chik; Doan Trang Nguyen; Jim Pouliopoulos; Chrishan Nalliah; Roger Hendricks; Stuart Thomas; Alistair L McEwan; Pramesh Kovoor; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Robotics and imaging in congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  Nikolay V Vasilyev; Pierre E Dupont; Pedro J del Nido
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2012-03

8.  Significant reduction in procedure duration in remote magnetic-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the third-generation magnetic navigation system.

Authors:  Tilman Maurer; Christian Sohns; Sebastian Deiss; Laura Rottner; Peter Wohlmuth; Bruno Reißmann; Christian H Heeger; Christine Lemes; Johannes Riedl; Francesco Santoro; Shibu Mathew; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Erik Wissner
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Qi Jin; Steen Pehrson; Peter Karl Jacobsen; Xu Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Bashar Aldhoon; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.