Literature DB >> 20936959

Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.

Sabrina Elisa Zange1, Adilson Luiz Ramos, Osmar Aparecido Cuoghi, Marcos Rogério de Mendonça, Rosely Suguino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the perception of orthodontists and laypersons regarding the size of the dark spaces in the buccal corridors and how that affects smile esthetics in individuals with long and short faces.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of eight smiling individuals were modified to create five sizes of dark spaces in the buccal corridors (2%, 10%, 15%, 22%, and 28%) and were submitted to a group of laypersons and a group of orthodontists.
RESULTS: Laypersons were more critical in their evaluation than orthodontists. Laypersons could not distinguish the gradation of dark spaces in the buccal corridor unless it was very plain. Orthodontists perceived this gradation beginning at 15%. Female evaluators were more critical than male evaluators in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence or absence of dark spaces in the buccal corridors has little influence over smile esthetics. While this aspect must be considered in the orthodontic diagnosis, there is no justification for expanding the buccal corridor to eliminate dark spaces unless they are very evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20936959      PMCID: PMC8926372          DOI: 10.2319/031210-145.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  15 in total

1.  Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics.

Authors:  V O Kokich; H A Kiyak; P A Shapiro
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1999

2.  Buccal smile corridors.

Authors:  Marc B Ackerman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen.

Authors:  Sanjay Manhar Parekh; Henry W Fields; Michael Beck; Stephen Rosenstiel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Dynamic smile analysis in young adults.

Authors:  Christopher Maulik; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space.

Authors:  S Parekh; H W Fields; F M Beck; S F Rosenstiel
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics.

Authors:  Eunkoo Kim; Anthony A Gianelly
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  C Phillips; C J Trentini; N Douvartzidis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile.

Authors:  C M Hulsey
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1970-02

9.  Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.

Authors:  Vincent O Kokich; Vincent G Kokich; H Asuman Kiyak
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling.

Authors:  Daltro Eneas Ritter; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini; Ary Dos Santos Pinto; Arno Locks
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  15 in total

1.  Influence of Smile Arc and Buccal Corridors on Facial Attractiveness: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Shashank Gaikwad; Harsimran Kaur; Anna C Vaz; Baldeep Singh; Lavina Taneja; K S Vinod; Prateek Verma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Analysis of smile esthetics in American Board of Orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Sercan Akyalcin; Leslie K Frels; Jeryl D English; Stephen Laman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness.

Authors:  Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira; Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta; Clarice Julia Guerra; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

4.  Influence of bimaxillary protrusion on the perception of smile esthetics.

Authors:  Terki K Almutairi; Sahar F Albarakati; Abdullah M Aldrees
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Kayure Rocha da Mata; Karina Silva Rocha; Brenda do Nascimento Costa; Fernando Neves; George Caique Gouveia Barbosa; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Buccal Corridors: A Fact or a Myth in the Eyes of Laymen?

Authors:  Omnia A Elhiny; Asmaa Y Harhash
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Comparison of the effect of labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors on esthetic profile in three different facial patterns.

Authors:  Praveen Chirivella; Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Prasad Mandava; V Karunakar Reddy; Jeevan Kumar Neravati; Suja Ani George
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

8.  Influence of the Smile Line on Smile Attractiveness in Short and Long Face Individuals.

Authors:  Amjad Al Taki; Thar Hayder Mohammed; Ahmad Mohammad Hamdan
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-08-08

9.  Smile esthetics: Evaluation of long-term changes in the transverse dimension.

Authors:  Sercan Akyalcin; Kenner Misner; Jeryl D English; Wick G Alexander; J Moody Alexander; Ron Gallerano
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Vestibulo-Oral inclination of maxillary and mandibular canines and bicuspids - a CBCT investigation.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Jörg A Lisson; Christine Goldbecher; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.