Literature DB >> 20936748

Perceived glossiness in high dynamic range scenes.

Katja Doerschner1, Laurence T Maloney, Huseyin Boyaci.   

Abstract

We investigated how spatial pattern, background, and dynamic range affect perceived gloss in brightly lit real scenes. Observers viewed spherical objects against uniform backgrounds. There were three possible objects. Two were black matte spheres with circular matte white dots painted on them (matte-dot spheres). The third sphere was painted glossy black (glossy black sphere). Backgrounds were either black or white matte, and observers saw each of the objects in turn on each background. Scenes were illuminated by an intense collimated source. On each trial, observers matched the apparent albedo of the sphere to an albedo reference scale and its apparent gloss to a gloss reference scale. We found that matte-dot spheres and the black glossy sphere were perceived as glossy on both backgrounds. All spheres were judged to be significantly glossier when in front of the black background. In contrast with previous research using conventional computer displays, we find that background markedly affects perceived gloss. This finding is surprising because darker surfaces are normally perceived as glossier (F. Pellacini, J. A. Ferwerda, & D. P. Greenberg, 2000). We conjecture that there are cues to surface material signaling glossiness present in high dynamic range scenes that are absent or weak in scenes presented using conventional computer displays.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20936748      PMCID: PMC4455063          DOI: 10.1167/10.9.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Perceived area and the luminosity threshold.

Authors:  F Bonato; A L Gilchrist
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-07

2.  Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Ron O Dror; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Remote effects of highlights on gloss perception.

Authors:  Julia Berzhanskaya; Gurumurthy Swaminathan; Jacob Beck; Ennio Mingolla
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  On visual detection of light sources.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976-02-05       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities.

Authors:  Isamu Motoyoshi; Shin'ya Nishida; Lavanya Sharan; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Michael S Landy; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

7.  Surface gloss and color perception of 3D objects.

Authors:  Bei Xiao; David H Brainard
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement.

Authors:  A L Gilchrist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The perception of luminosity on different backgrounds and in different illuminations.

Authors:  F Bonato; A L Gilchrist
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Highlights and the perception of glossiness.

Authors:  J Beck; S Prazdny
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-10
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Color and material perception: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Laurence T Maloney; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Naturally glossy: Gloss perception, illumination statistics, and tone mapping.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Gizem Kucukoglu; Michael S Landy; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The dark side of gloss.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Phillip J Marlow; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Accuracy and speed of material categorization in real-world images.

Authors:  Lavanya Sharan; Ruth Rosenholtz; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceptual gloss parameters are encoded by population responses in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Nishio; Takeaki Shimokawa; Naokazu Goda; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Joint effects of illumination geometry and object shape in the perception of surface reflectance.

Authors:  Maria Olkkonen; David H Brainard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-12-14

7.  Differential processing of binocular and monocular gloss cues in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Massimiliano Di Luca; Hiroshi Ban; Alexander Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A Glossy Simultaneous Contrast: Conjoint Measurements of Gloss and Lightness.

Authors:  Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-01-01

9.  The dress and individual differences in the perception of surface properties.

Authors:  Christoph Witzel; J Kevin O'Regan; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  fMRI evidence for areas that process surface gloss in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Hiroshi Ban; Massimiliano Di Luca; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.