Literature DB >> 23001059

The dark side of gloss.

Juno Kim1, Phillip J Marlow, Barton L Anderson.   

Abstract

Our visual system relies on the image structure generated by the interaction of light with objects to infer their material properties. One widely studied surface property is gloss, which can provide information that an object is smooth, shiny or wet. Studies have historically focused on the role of specular highlights in modulating perceived gloss. Here we show in human observers that glossy surfaces can generate both bright specular highlights and dark specular 'lowlights', and that the presence of either is sufficient to generate compelling percepts of gloss. We show that perceived gloss declines when the image structure generated by specular lowlights is blurred or misaligned with surrounding surface shading and that perceived gloss can arise from the presence of lowlights in surface regions isolated from highlights. These results suggest that the image structure generated by specular highlights and lowlights is used to construct our experience of surface gloss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001059     DOI: 10.1038/nn.3221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  15 in total

1.  Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Ron O Dror; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Illusory gloss on Lambertian surfaces.

Authors:  Maarten W A Wijntjes; Sylvia C Pont
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance.

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul; Vebjørn Ekroll; Rainer Mausfeld
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Specular reflections and the perception of shape.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Antonio Torralba; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities.

Authors:  Isamu Motoyoshi; Shin'ya Nishida; Lavanya Sharan; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Highlight disparity contributes to the authenticity and strength of perceived glossiness.

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul; Rainer Mausfeld
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Phillip Marlow; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Highlights and the perception of glossiness.

Authors:  J Beck; S Prazdny
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-10

10.  Perceived glossiness and lightness under real-world illumination.

Authors:  Maria Olkkonen; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  23 in total

1.  Specular reflections and the estimation of shape from binocular disparity.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Andrew E Welchman; Andrew Blake; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Accuracy and speed of material categorization in real-world images.

Authors:  Lavanya Sharan; Ruth Rosenholtz; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Perceptual gloss parameters are encoded by population responses in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Nishio; Takeaki Shimokawa; Naokazu Goda; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  RenderToolbox3: MATLAB tools that facilitate physically based stimulus rendering for vision research.

Authors:  Benjamin S Heasly; Nicolas P Cottaris; Daniel P Lichtman; Bei Xiao; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A unified account of perceptual layering and surface appearance in terms of gamut relativity.

Authors:  Tony Vladusich; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  'Proto-rivalry': how the binocular brain identifies gloss.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Differential processing of binocular and monocular gloss cues in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; Massimiliano Di Luca; Hiroshi Ban; Alexander Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Enhancement of glossiness perception by retinal-image motion: additional effect of head-yoked motion parallax.

Authors:  Yusuke Tani; Keisuke Araki; Takehiro Nagai; Kowa Koida; Shigeki Nakauchi; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Human visual cortical responses to specular and matte motion flows.

Authors:  Tae-Eui Kam; Damien J Mannion; Seong-Whan Lee; Katja Doerschner; Daniel J Kersten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Surface qualities have little effect on vection strength.

Authors:  Masaki Ogawa; Chihiro Hiramatsu; Takeharu Seno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.