Literature DB >> 20934695

Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation: comparison between two surgical procedures for anatomic reconstruction.

Gianfranco Fraschini1, Pietro Ciampi, Celeste Scotti, Rosa Ballis, Giuseppe M Peretti.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of chronic complete acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is still debated and no gold standard surgical procedure has been identified.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective series of 90 patients treated for AC dislocations is reported here. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 receiving AC reconstruction with a Dacron vascular prosthesis; group 2 receiving AC reconstruction with LARS(®) artificial ligament; group 3 receiving conservative treatment. Follow-up was performed after 1, 6 and 15 months with plain radiographs, UCLA, SPADI and modified UCLA acromioclavicular rating scales.
RESULTS: Patients treated surgically presented significant better functional outcome compared to patients treated conservatively with overall positive results in 93.3% of patients for group 2 and 53.3% of patients for group 1. However, reconstruction with Dacron vascular prosthesis presented an unacceptable high complications rate (43.3%).
CONCLUSION: Our results show that anatomic AC reconstruction with LARS(®) artificial ligament resulted in both satisfactory functional outcome and low complication rate. Therefore, we recommend this procedure for the treatment of chronic complete AC dislocations.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20934695     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  24 in total

1.  Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Renato Andrade; Pedro Silva Moreira; Luís Coutinho; Olufemi R Ayeni; Nuno Sevivas; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Three intrasubstance failures of a LARS™ ligament used for ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  V Ramsingh; A D Yewlett; H C Pullen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes.

Authors:  Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Christopher Manning; Philip Wright; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Lennard Funk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anthony J Scillia; E Lyle Cain
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-12-28

5.  Results of Arthroscopy-Assisted TightRope Repair of Acromioclavicular Dislocations.

Authors:  Tapio E Flinkkilä; Essi Ihanainen
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2013-08-23

Review 6.  Comparison of the outcome of early and delayed surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Tengfei Song; Xu Yan; Tianwen Ye
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sircana; Maristella F Saccomanno; Fabrizio Mocini; Vincenzo Campana; Piermarco Messinese; Andrea Monteleone; Andrea Salvi; Alessandra Scaini; Almerico Megaro; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by coracoclavicular ligament augmentation.

Authors:  Xudong Liu; Xiaoqiao Huangfu; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Nan Lu; Lei Zhu; Tianwen Ye; Aimin Chen; Xi Jiang; Zhiling Zhang; Qinghua Zhu; Qinghe Guo; Di Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Clinical and radiological results after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using three different techniques. A retrospective study.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Stefano Schiavetti; Giuseppe Battistella; Enrico Rebuzzi; Nicolò Coletti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.