Literature DB >> 20933526

Behavioral and ERP evidence for amodal sluggish attentional shifting in developmental dyslexia.

Marie Lallier1, Marie-Josèphe Tainturier, Benjamin Dering, Sophie Donnadieu, Sylviane Valdois, Guillaume Thierry.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the claim that amodal deficits in attentional shifting may be the source of reading acquisition disorders in phonological developmental dyslexia (sluggish attentional shifting, SAS, theory, Hari & Renvall, 2001). We investigated automatic attentional shifting in the auditory and visual modalities in 13 dyslexic young adults with a phonological awareness deficit and 13 control participants, matched for cognitive abilities, using both behavioral and ERP measures. We tested automatic attentional shifting using a stream segregation task (perception of rapid succession of visual and auditory stimuli as one or two streams). Results of Experiment 1(behavioral) suggested that in order to process two successive stimuli separately dyslexic participants required a significantly longer inter-stimulus interval than controls regardless of sensory modality. In Experiment 2 (ERPs), the same participants were tested by means of an auditory and a visual oddball tasks involving variations in the tempo of the same alternating stimuli as Experiment 1. P3b amplitudes elicited by deviant tempos were differently modulated between groups, supporting predictions made on the basis of observations in Experiment 1. Overall, these results support the hypothesis that SAS in dyslexic participants might be responsible for their atypical perception of rapid sequential stimulus sequences in both the auditory and the visual modalities. Furthermore, these results bring new evidence supporting the link between amodal SAS and the phonological impairment in developmental dyslexia.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20933526     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  23 in total

1.  Second language feedback abolishes the "hot hand" effect during even-probability gambling.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Ondrej Zika; Robert D Rogers; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Relationship between individual differences in speech processing and cognitive functions.

Authors:  Jinghua Ou; Sam-Po Law; Roxana Fung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Steven G Zecker; Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Investigating the role of temporal processing in developmental dyslexia: Evidence for a specific deficit in rapid visual segmentation.

Authors:  Luca Ronconi; David Melcher; Laura Franchin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

6.  Sound can improve visual search in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Liselotte de Boer-Schellekens; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Chen Chen; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Encoding order and developmental dyslexia: a family of skills predicting different orthographic components.

Authors:  Cristina Romani; Effie Tsouknida; Andrew Olson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Investigating the role of visual and auditory search in reading and developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Marie Lallier; Sophie Donnadieu; Sylviane Valdois
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun; Chen Chen; Amanda Heffner-Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.