Literature DB >> 20932676

Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.

Harry C Y Cheng1, Vincent W C Wu, Eva S F Liu, Dora L W Kwong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the image quality and dosimetry on the Varian cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system between software Version 1.4.13 and Version 1.4.11 (referred to as "new" and "old" protocols, respectively, in the following text). This study investigated organ absorbed dose, total effective dose, and image quality of the CBCT system for the head-and-neck and pelvic regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A calibrated Farmer chamber and two standard cylindrical Perspex CT dosimetry phantoms with diameter of 16 cm (head phantom) and 32 cm (body phantom) were used to measure the weighted cone-beam computed tomography dose index (CBCTDIw) of the Varian CBCT system. The absorbed dose of different organs was measured in a female anthropomorphic phantom with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and the total effective dose was estimated according to International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103. The dose measurement and image quality were studied for head-and-neck and pelvic regions, and comparison was made between the new and old protocols.
RESULTS: The values of the new CBCTDIw head-and-neck and pelvic protocols were 36.6 and 29.4 mGy, respectively. The total effective doses from the new head-and-neck and pelvic protocols were 1.7 and 8.2 mSv, respectively. The absorbed doses of lens for the new 200° and old 360° head-and-neck protocols were 3.8 and 59.4 mGy, respectively. The additional secondary cancer risk from daily CBCT might be up to 2.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: The new Varian CBCT provided volumetric information for image guidance with acceptable image quality and lower radiation dose. This imaging tool gave a better standard for patient daily setup verification.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20932676     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  [Quantitative evaluation of image quality of megavoltage computed tomography for guiding helical tomotherapy].

Authors:  Y L Huang; C G Li; K Mao; J A Wu; T T Dai; Y Y Han; H Wu; H Y Wang; Y B Zhang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-06-18

2.  Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography image quality assurance for Vero4DRT system.

Authors:  Hideharu Miura; Shuichi Ozawa; Masahiro Hayata; Shintarou Tsuda; Tsubasa Enosaki; Kiyoshi Yamada; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms.

Authors:  E Choi; N L Ford
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Low dose cone-beam computed tomography reconstruction via hybrid prior contour based total variation regularization (hybrid-PCTV).

Authors:  Yingxuan Chen; Fang-Fang Yin; Yawei Zhang; You Zhang; Lei Ren
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-07

5.  Daily edge deformation prediction using an unsupervised convolutional neural network model for low dose prior contour based total variation CBCT reconstruction (PCTV-CNN).

Authors:  Yingxuan Chen; Fang-Fang Yin; Zhuoran Jiang; Lei Ren
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-10-07

6.  Phantom-based evaluation of dose exposure of ultrafast combined kV-MV-CBCT towards clinical implementation for IGRT of lung cancer.

Authors:  Anna Arns; Manuel Blessing; Jens Fleckenstein; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Juergen Hesser; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Hansjoerg Wertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Radiation treatment planning and delivery strategies for a pregnant brain tumor patient.

Authors:  Zacariah E Labby; Brendan Barraclough; R Adam Bayliss; Abigail E Besemer; David A P Dunkerley; Steven P Howard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Measurement of eye lens dose for Varian On-Board Imaging with different cone-beam computed tomography acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Sudesh Deshpande; Deepak Dhote; Kalpna Thakur; Amol Pawar; Rajesh Kumar; Munish Kumar; M S Kulkarni; S D Sharma; V Kannan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  A study on image quality provided by a kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Julia Garayoa; Pablo Castro
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Technical note: No increase in effective dose from half compared to full rotation pelvis cone beam CT.

Authors:  Pascal Hauri; Roger A Hälg; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.