Literature DB >> 20931321

[Minimally invasive anterolateral approach for total hip replacement (OCM technique)].

Heinz Röttinger1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hip replacement with reduction of operative trauma. Thereby earlier mobilization and faster rehabilitation time compared with conventional techniques. No restrictions with regard to exposure of femur and acetabulum. INDICATIONS: Primary total hip arthroplasty. With experience also applicable in revisions. CONTRAINDICATIONS: None. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Patient in lateral position with fixed pelvis. Leg support for the leg being operated and modified leg support for the contralateral side on the operating table. Special retractors and instruments are advisable. Skin incision over the anterior portion of the greater trochanter slightly curved then over the muscular interval between gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae. Fascia incision. Preparation of anterolateral muscular interval. Exposure and incision of capsule. Leg positioning for neck osteotomy in external rotation and hyperextension. For preparation of acetabulum leg again on support. Preparation of acetabulum and cup implantation. For femoral preparation leg in external rotation, hyperextension, and adduction. Capsular release nearby greater trochanter. Capsular release and stem implantation. Repositioning. Capsule and wound closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early mobilization. Physical therapy and lymph drainage. Loading of the leg according to tolerance; if patient is pain-free, full weight bearing allowed. Thrombosis prophylaxis for at least 3 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: Currently, the experience comprises over 3,500 patients operated on using the minimally invasive anterolateral approach since March 2003. Restrictions regarding indications are not known. In experienced hands, the technique can even be used for revision surgery. The clinical results show significant differences with improved clinical results as compared to patients after standard approaches, especially in terms of skin-to-skin time, blood loss, use of analgesics, rehabilitation time, and functional outcome. The accuracy of implant placement is not compromised. After a fundamental learning curve, there is no evidence of increased complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20931321     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-8035-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  19 in total

1.  A comprehensive exposure of the hip joint.

Authors:  F JERGESEN; L C ABBOTT
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1955-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The transgluteal approach to the hip joint.

Authors:  R Bauer; F Kerschbaumer; S Poisel; W Oberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1979-10

3.  A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Luke Ogonda; Roger Wilson; Pooler Archbold; Marie Lawlor; Patricia Humphreys; Seamus O'Brien; David Beverland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Learning curve for a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement: analysis of complications and early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Laffosse; Philippe Chiron; Franck Accadbled; François Molinier; Jean-Louis Tricoire; Jean Puget
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter.

Authors:  Justin de Beer; Danielle Petruccelli; Paul Zalzal; Mitchell J Winemaker
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Minimally invasive total hip replacement with the patient in the supine position and the contralateral leg elevated.

Authors:  Reinhard Graf; Mohammad Azizbaig-Mohajer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  [The MIS anterolateral approach for THA].

Authors:  H Röttinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Two-year experience using a limited-incision direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Oinuma; Christoph Eingartner; Yasufumi Saito; Hideaki Shiratsuchi
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience.

Authors:  Thomas P Sculco; Louis C Jordan; William L Walter
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Resection at symptomatic cam impingement. Use of a minimally invasive antero-lateral approach].

Authors:  Johannes Weihs; P Scacchi; R Hess; C E Albers
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Modified mini-Hardinge access for hip prosthesis implantation in the supine position].

Authors:  F Mazoochian; F Schmidutz; A Fottner; V Jansson
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  [Minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty : Surgical technique of the future?].

Authors:  M Wörner; M Weber; P Lechler; E Sendtner; J Grifka; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Clinical results of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Jung; K Anagnostakos; D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.