Literature DB >> 20930654

The floating mass transducer on the round window versus attachment to an ossicular replacement prosthesis.

Yoshitaka Shimizu1, Sunil Puria, Richard L Goode.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The Vibrant Soundbridge floating mass transducer (FMT) is part of a commercially available implantable hearing device in which the FMT can be placed in the round window (RW) niche or attached to a partial (V-PORP) or total ossicular replacement prosthesis (V-TORP) contacting the stapes head or footplate. The goal is to provide efficient transfer of sound vibration into the cochlea. The hypothesis is that the FMT location on the prosthesis is superior to the RW location.
BACKGROUND: No direct comparisons of the 3 FMT sites have been performed using the same measurement location.
METHODS: A new measurement method called the third window method was used in eleven fresh human temporal bones to compare the sites. A small hole was made into the scala tympani of the temporal bones preserving the endosteum. A reflective target was placed on the third window endosteum and displacement of the cochlear fluid was measured using a Polytec HLV-1000 laser Doppler vibrometer. The input to the FMT at all locations was a constant 316 millivolts (mV); the frequency range was 0.5 to 8.0 kHz.
RESULTS: The V-PORP and V-TORP FMT locations both provided statistically significant better performance above 1.0 kHz than the RW site but not below that frequency. The V-PORP and V-TORP responses were similar at all test frequencies.
CONCLUSION: In this temporal bone model, the FMT provided better higher frequency performance when attached to a PORP or TORP than in the RW niche.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20930654      PMCID: PMC3018732          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f7ad76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  23 in total

1.  First audiometric results with the Vibrant soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  A F Snik; C W Cremers
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction.

Authors:  J W House; K B Teufert
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach.

Authors:  J H Spindel; P R Lambert; R A Ruth
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Implantation of electromagnetic ossicular replacement device.

Authors:  M Tos; G Salomon; P Bonding
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.697

5.  New knowledge about the function of the human middle ear: development of an improved analog model.

Authors:  R L Goode; M Killion; K Nakamura; S Nishihara
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-03

6.  Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device.

Authors:  U Fisch; C W Cremers; T Lenarz; B Weber; G Babighian; A S Uziel; D W Proops; A F O'Connor; R Charachon; J Helms; B Fraysse
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: phase I. Clinical trials.

Authors:  T M McGee; J M Kartush; J C Heide; D I Bojrab; J D Clemis; K C Kulick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.

Authors:  C Streitberger; M Perotti; M A Beltrame; N Giarbini
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2009

9.  Piezoelectric middle ear implant preserving the ossicular chain.

Authors:  T Dumon; O Zennaro; J M Aran; J P Bébéar
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France.

Authors:  Olivier Sterkers; Didier Boucarra; Samia Labassi; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Christian Dubreuil; Bruno Frachet; Bernard Fraysse; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Jacques Magnan; Christian Martin; Eric Truy; Alain Uziel; François Michel Vaneecloo
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [The Vibrant Soundbridge as an active implant in middle ear surgery].

Authors:  T Beleites; M Bornitz; M Neudert; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  A tri-coil bellows-type round window transducer with improved frequency characteristics for middle-ear implants.

Authors:  Dong Ho Shin; Ki Woong Seong; Sunil Puria; Kyu-Yup Lee; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge RW-Coupler for round window Vibroplasty with tympanosclerosis.

Authors:  Satoshi Iwasaki; Hiroaki Suzuki; Hideaki Moteki; Maiko Miyagawa; Yutaka Takumi; Shin-Ichi Usami
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Piezoelectric Actuator with Frequency Characteristics for a Middle-Ear Implant.

Authors:  Dong Ho Shin; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Design Study of a Round Window Piezoelectric Transducer for Active Middle Ear Implants.

Authors:  Dong Ho Shin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.