Literature DB >> 10582535

First audiometric results with the Vibrant soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss.

A F Snik1, C W Cremers.   

Abstract

The Vibrant soundbridge is a semi-implantable hearing device. The implanted electromagnetic transducer is attached to the incus and it is linked by telemetry to the externally worn audio processor. In Nijmegen, this device has been applied to seven patients with moderate or severe sensorineural hearing loss (PTA between 43 and 71 dB HL) who could not tolerate ear moulds. As the amplification of the device depends on the input level (amplifier with wide dynamic range compression), loudness scaling measurements were performed. The gain as a function of input level was determined from aided and unaided loudness growth curves. The mean gain was 21 dB at an input level of 40 dB SPL. The mean gain decreased to 5 dB at an input level of 90 dB SPL. Measured gain values were lower than target values prescribed by the FIG6 method, mainly however for the low-frequency range and for low-level sounds. It was concluded that this device is very promising for patients who cannot tolerate an ear mould.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10582535     DOI: 10.3109/00206099909073045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Semi-implantable hearing aids for sensorineural hearing loss and combined hearing loss: experiences at the German Armed Forces Hospital in Ulm].

Authors:  M Tisch; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The vibrant® soundbridge™.

Authors:  Deborah Arthur
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-06

3.  [The application of implantable hearing aids using the Vibrant Soundbridge as an example].

Authors:  T Strenger; T Stark
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Subtotal petrosectomy and Codacs™: new possibilities in ears with chronic infection.

Authors:  Burkard Schwab; Eugen Kludt; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz; Magnus Teschner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The floating mass transducer on the round window versus attachment to an ossicular replacement prosthesis.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Shimizu; Sunil Puria; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Design and optimization of auditory prostheses using the finite element method: a narrative review.

Authors:  Qianli Cheng; Han Yu; Junpei Liu; Qi Zheng; Yanru Bai; Guangjian Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 7.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE SOUND IMPLANT.

Authors:  Alan Pegan; Mihael Ries; Jakov Ajduk; Vladimir Bedeković; Mirko Ivkić; Robert Trotić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.