Literature DB >> 20926662

Auditory cortical neurons convey maximal stimulus-specific information at their best frequency.

Nathan Montgomery1, Michael Wehr.   

Abstract

Sensory neurons are often thought to encode information about their preferred stimuli. It has also been proposed that neurons convey the most information about stimuli in the flanks of their tuning curves, where firing rate changes most steeply. Here we demonstrate that the responses of rat auditory cortical neurons convey maximal stimulus-specific information about sound frequency at their best frequency, rather than in the flanks of their tuning curves. Theoretical work has shown that stimulus-specific information shifts from tuning curve slope to peak as neuronal variability increases. These results therefore suggest that with respect to the most informative regions of the tuning curve, auditory cortical neurons operate in a regime of high variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20926662      PMCID: PMC3838392          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  18 in total

1.  Trial-to-trial variability and state-dependent modulation of auditory-evoked responses in cortex.

Authors:  M A Kisley; G L Gerstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Low response variability in simultaneously recorded retinal, thalamic, and cortical neurons.

Authors:  P Kara; P Reinagel; R C Reid
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Anesthesia changes frequency tuning of neurons in the rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  B H Gaese; J Ostwald
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  D McAlpine; D Jiang; A R Palmer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  How much information is associated with a particular stimulus?

Authors:  Daniel A Butts
Journal:  Network       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.273

6.  Binary spiking in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael R DeWeese; Michael Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  A F Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures.

Authors:  Stefano Panzeri; Riccardo Senatore; Marcelo A Montemurro; Rasmus S Petersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Whisker vibration information carried by rat barrel cortex neurons.

Authors:  Ehsan Arabzadeh; Stefano Panzeri; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Amplification of trial-to-trial response variability by neurons in visual cortex.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  13 in total

1.  Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Elisa Kim Fromboluti; J Devin McAuley; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Limitations to Estimating Mutual Information in Large Neural Populations.

Authors:  Jan Mölter; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.524

3.  Decoding stimulus duration from neural responses in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Brandon Aubie; Riziq Sayegh; Thane Fremouw; Ellen Covey; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Modifying the Adult Rat Tonotopic Map with Sound Exposure Produces Frequency Discrimination Deficits That Are Recovered with Training.

Authors:  Maryse E Thomas; Conor P Lane; Yohann M J Chaudron; J Miguel Cisneros-Franco; Étienne de Villers-Sidani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Plasticity of cortical excitatory-inhibitory balance.

Authors:  Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Linking topography to tonotopy in the mouse auditory thalamocortical circuit.

Authors:  Troy A Hackett; Tania Rinaldi Barkat; Barbara M J O'Brien; Takao K Hensch; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rapid Rebalancing of Excitation and Inhibition by Cortical Circuitry.

Authors:  Alexandra K Moore; Aldis P Weible; Timothy S Balmer; Laurence O Trussell; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  FosGFP expression does not capture a sensory learning-related engram in superficial layers of mouse barrel cortex.

Authors:  Jiseok Lee; Joanna Urban-Ciecko; Eunsol Park; Mo Zhu; Stephanie E Myal; David J Margolis; Alison L Barth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Quantitative analysis of neuronal response properties in primary and higher-order auditory cortical fields of awake house mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Bettina Joachimsthaler; Michaela Uhlmann; Frank Miller; Günter Ehret; Simone Kurt
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.698

10.  The influence of population size, noise strength and behavioral task on best-encoded stimulus for neurons with unimodal or monotonic tuning curves.

Authors:  Stuart Yarrow; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.