Literature DB >> 25934460

Modeling the Innovation-Decision Process: Dissemination and Adoption of a Motivational Interviewing Preparatory Procedure In Addiction Outpatient Clinics.

Kimberly S Walitzer1, Kurt H Dermen2, Christopher Barrick2, Kathleen Shyhalla2.   

Abstract

Widespread adoption of empirically-supported treatment innovations has the potential to improve effectiveness of treatment received by individuals with substance use disorders. However, the process of disseminating such innovations has been complex, slow, and difficult. We empirically describe the dissemination and adoption of a treatment innovation--an alcohol-treatment preparatory therapeutic procedure based on motivational interviewing (MI)--in the context of Rogers' (2003) five stages of innovation-decision process (knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation and confirmation). To this end, 145 randomly-chosen outpatient addiction treatment clinics in New York State received an onsite visit from a project trainer delivering one of three randomly-assigned dissemination intensities: a 15-minute, a half-day or a full-day presentation. Across these clinics, 141 primary administrators and 837 clinicians completed questionnaires assessing aspects of five innovation-decision stages. At each clinic, questionnaire administration occurred immediately pre- and post-dissemination, as well as 1 and 6 months after dissemination. Consistent with Rogers' theory, earlier stages of the innovation-decision process predicted later stages. As hypothesized, dissemination intensity predicted clinicians' post-dissemination knowledge. Clinician baseline characteristics (including gender, pre-dissemination knowledge regarding the MI preparatory technique, education, case load, beliefs regarding the nature of alcohol problems, and beliefs and behavior with regard to therapeutic style) predicted knowledge and persuasion stage variables. One baseline clinic characteristic (i.e., clinic mean beliefs and behavior regarding an MI-consistent therapeutic style) predicted implementation stage variables. Findings suggest that dissemination strategies should accommodate clinician and clinic characteristics.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addictions; Adoption; Dissemination; Innovation–decision process; Motivational interviewing; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25934460      PMCID: PMC4561056          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  43 in total

1.  A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing.

Authors:  William R Miller; Carolina E Yahne; Theresa B Moyers; James Martinez; Matthew Pirritano
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Effectiveness of workshop training for psychosocial addiction treatments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Sarah A Matson; John S Baer; Douglas M Ziedonis
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2005-12

3.  Providing live supervision via teleconferencing improves acquisition of motivational interviewing skills after workshop attendance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Smith; Paul C Amrhein; Adam C Brooks; Kenneth M Carpenter; Deborah Levin; Elizabeth A Schreiber; Laura A Travaglini; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: a survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices.

Authors:  Diane M Herbeck; Yih-Ing Hser; Cheryl Teruya
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Randomized trial of training and supervision in motivational interviewing with adolescent drug treatment practitioners.

Authors:  Luke Mitcheson; Kaanan Bhavsar; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-01-15

6.  Enhancing adoption of an alcohol abuse prevention program: An application of diffusion theory.

Authors:  M Laflin; E W Edmundson; S Moore-Hirschl
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  1995-09

Review 7.  The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses.

Authors:  Brad Lundahl; Brian L Burke
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-11

8.  Training workshops positively impact beliefs about contingency management in a nationwide dissemination effort.

Authors:  Carla J Rash; Dominick Dephilippis; James R McKay; Michelle Drapkin; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-04-24

9.  Using distance education to promote the transfer of motivational interviewing skills among behavioral health professionals.

Authors:  Michael S Shafer; Robert Rhode; Jenny Chong
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2004-03

10.  Agency context and tailored training in technology transfer: a pilot evaluation of motivational interviewing training for community counselors.

Authors:  John S Baer; Elizabeth A Wells; David B Rosengren; Bryan Hartzler; Blair Beadnell; Chris Dunn
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-03-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  Variability in motivational interviewing adherence across sessions, providers, sites, and research contexts.

Authors:  Kevin A Hallgren; Aaron Dembe; Brian T Pace; Zac E Imel; Christine M Lee; David C Atkins
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-10-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.