Literature DB >> 20921108

Geometric and featural representations in semantic concepts.

Wolf Vanpaemel1, Timothy Verbeemen, Matthew Dry, Tom Verguts, Gert Storms.   

Abstract

We explore the adequacy of two types of similarity representation in the context of semantic concepts. To this end, we evaluate different categorization models, assuming either a geometric or a featural representation, using categorization decisions involving familiar and unfamiliar foods and animals. The study aims to assess the optimal stimulus representation as a function of the familiarity of the stimuli. For the unfamiliar stimuli, the geometric categorization models provide the best account of the categorization data, whereas for the familiar stimuli, the featural categorization models provide the best account. This pattern of results suggests that people rely on perceptual information to assign an unfamiliar stimulus to a category but rely on more elaborate conceptual knowledge when assigning a familiar stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921108     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.7.962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Determining the Dimensionality of Multidimensional Scaling Representations for Cognitive Modeling.

Authors:  Michael D. Lee
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

3.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Abstraction and model evaluation in category learning.

Authors:  Wolf Vanpaemel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-05

5.  In search of abstraction: the varying abstraction model of categorization.

Authors:  Wolf Vanpaemel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

6.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

7.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Latent features in similarity judgments: a nonparametric bayesian approach.

Authors:  Daniel J Navarro; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love; Douglas L Medin; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.