| Literature DB >> 20921108 |
Wolf Vanpaemel1, Timothy Verbeemen, Matthew Dry, Tom Verguts, Gert Storms.
Abstract
We explore the adequacy of two types of similarity representation in the context of semantic concepts. To this end, we evaluate different categorization models, assuming either a geometric or a featural representation, using categorization decisions involving familiar and unfamiliar foods and animals. The study aims to assess the optimal stimulus representation as a function of the familiarity of the stimuli. For the unfamiliar stimuli, the geometric categorization models provide the best account of the categorization data, whereas for the familiar stimuli, the featural categorization models provide the best account. This pattern of results suggests that people rely on perceptual information to assign an unfamiliar stimulus to a category but rely on more elaborate conceptual knowledge when assigning a familiar stimulus.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20921108 DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.7.962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Cognit ISSN: 0090-502X