Literature DB >> 20890875

Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients.

Namita Singh1, Ingemar Davidson, Abu Minhajuddin, Steven Gieser, Michael Nurenberg, Ramesh Saxena.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter outcomes at our center and assess factors affecting catheter survival.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study on 315 patients who had their first PD catheter placed between January 2001 and September 2009 at the UT Southwestern/DaVita Peritoneal Dialysis Clinic at Dallas, Texas. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical information of the patients. The primary end point of the study was PD catheter failure, defined as removal of a dysfunctional PD catheter due to catheter-related complications. Catheter survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify factors that are independently associated with catheter survival.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 49.7 ± 29 yrs. The study population included 54.6% females, 42.5% African American, 27.9% Caucasian and 22.9% Hispanic patients. Diabetes was the primary etiology of end-stage renal disease in 43.2% of patients. More than 90% of patients had one or more co-morbidities, and 57.5% had previous abdominal surgery. The mean BMI for the group was 28.6 ± 13.8 kg/m2. Less than a quarter of the patients (24.1%) had non-infectious/mechanical catheter problems. Overall PD catheter survival rates over 12, 24 and 36 months were 92.9%, 91.9% and 91.1%, respectively. PD catheter-related non-infectious problem was the only independent variable that was significantly associated with catheter survival (hazard ratio 22.467; 95% CI 6.665-75.732). No significant association was observed between the PD catheter survival and other risk factors including age, body mass index (BMI), diabetic status, co-morbidities, previous abdominal surgeries or infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an excellent 3-yr PD catheter survival (91.1%). Only PD catheter-related non-infectious problems are significantly associated with catheter failure. Other factors such as age, gender, race, BMI, diabetic status, co-morbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, peritoneal infections or exit site/tunnel infections were not found to affect the PD catheter survival and should not be considered barriers to PD initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20890875      PMCID: PMC3207262          DOI: 10.5301/jva.2010.5774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Access        ISSN: 1129-7298            Impact factor:   2.283


  24 in total

1.  Predictors of survival and technique success after reinsertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter following severe peritonitis.

Authors:  Sue D Cox; Stephen B Walsh; Muhammad M Yaqoob; Stanley L-S Fan
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome.

Authors:  M F Gadallah; A Pervez; M A el-Shahawy; D Sorrells; G Zibari; J McDonald; J Work
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Complications of permanent catheter implantation for peritoneal dialysis: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  T García Falcón; A Rodríguez-Carmona; M Pérez Fontán; C Fernández Rivera; P Bouza; I Rodríguez Lozano; F Valdés
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1994

4.  Kinetic modeling of peritoneal transport.

Authors:  R P Popovich; J W Moncrief
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.580

5.  The effect of body weight on CAPD related infections and catheter loss.

Authors:  B Piraino; J Bernardini; P K Centa; J R Johnston; M I Sorkin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Edward F Vonesh; Jon J Snyder; Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Risk factors and cause of removal of peritoneal dialysis catheter in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Yuka Nodaira; Naofumi Ikeda; Kazuhiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Watanabe; Tsutomu Inoue; Shiko Gen; Yoshihiko Kanno; Hidetomo Nakamoto; Hiromichi Suzuki
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2008

Review 8.  What is the place of peritoneal dialysis in the integrated treatment of renal failure?

Authors:  G A Coles; J D Williams
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Determinants of catheter loss following continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis.

Authors:  Chih-Yu Yang; Tzen-Wen Chen; Yao-Ping Lin; Chih-Ching Lin; Yee-Yung Ng; Wu-Chang Yang; Jinn-Yang Chen
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  R P Popovich; J W Moncrief; K D Nolph; A J Ghods; Z J Twardowski; W K Pyle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Peritoneal dialysis associated infections: An update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Jacob A Akoh
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-06

2.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used.

Authors:  Monika A Krezalek; Nicolas Bonamici; Kristine Kuchta; Brittany Lapin; JoAnn Carbray; Woody Denham; John Linn; Michael Ujiki; Stephen P Haggerty
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  How To Build a Successful Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Program.

Authors:  Nilum Rajora; Shani Shastri; Gulzar Pirwani; Ramesh Saxena
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-08-11

4.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Viability of Peritoneal Drainage Catheters Implanted in Rats for Extended Durations.

Authors:  Nathan Legband; Arielle Black; Craig Kreikemeier-Bower; Benjamin S Terry
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Peritoneal Dialysis as a First versus Second Option after Previous Haemodialysis: A Very Long-Term Assessment.

Authors:  Roberto José Barone; María Inés Cámpora; Nélida Susana Gimenez; Liliana Ramirez; Sergio Alberto Panese; Mónica Santopietro
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 6.  Surgical versus percutaneous techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: A meta-analysis of the outcomes.

Authors:  Thawatchai Tullavardhana; Prinya Akranurakkul; Withoon Ungkitphaiboon; Dolrudee Songtish
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-14

7.  Reducing the occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience about CQI.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Zuoliang Liu; Jun Liu; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

8.  Identification of the appropriate fixation site to avoid peritoneal catheter migration based on a mechanical analysis.

Authors:  Yujuan Wang; Yao Zou; Xinghua Chen; Jili Zhu; Cuizhi Xiang; Houjun Jia; Guohua Ding; Huiming Wang
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.606

9.  Assessment of complications and short-term outcomes of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by conventional or modified Seldinger technique.

Authors:  Yun Zou; Yibo Ma; Wenying Chao; Hua Zhou; Yin Zong; Min Yang
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

10.  Outcomes of dialysis catheters placed by the Y-TEC peritoneoscopic technique: a single-center surgical experience.

Authors:  Yorg Al Azzi; Etti Zeldis; Girish N Nadkarni; Harry Schanzer; Jaime Uribarri
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.