BACKGROUND: Peritonitis remains the most important complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The success rate of restarting PD after severe peritonitis (peritonitis unresolved despite treatment with appropriate antibiotics for 3 days, or fungal or pseudomonas infections) is unclear. We wished to determine PD technique survival and overall mortality when PD is offered to these patients and to identify predictors of successful reinitiation. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 556 patients undergoing PD between January 2000 and December 2001. We collected demographic information from the 106 patients who had their PD catheter removed for peritonitis, details about their dialysis history and peritonitis, and whether they successfully restarted PD and if not, the reason. RESULTS: We divided patients into groups as follows: group 1 (n = 42) underwent catheter reinsertion, group 2 (n = 16) had no medical contraindication to restarting PD but the patients elected to remain on hemodialysis, group 3 (n = 35) were deemed medically unsuitable to return to PD, and group 4 (n = 13) were those that died within 4 weeks of presenting with peritonitis. If there were no medical contraindications, Indo-Asians were more likely to retry PD. In group 1, after a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 7.3 months, 23 of 42 patients restarted PD successfully. Technique survival for group 1 as a whole was 69% at 3 months and 55% at the end of follow-up. Patients of greater dialysis vintage were more likely to develop PD technique failure after restarting. Of those judged suitable for PD, there was no statistically significant difference in the mortality of patients who wished to either restart PD or remain on hemodialysis (group 1 vs group 2). Significant numbers of patients returned successfully to PD after pseudomonas and fungal peritonitis. CONCLUSION: Restarting PD after severe peritonitis was possible and safe. Ethnicity was an important predictor for wanting to retry PD, but not for technique failure: given the choice, Indo-Asians preferred PD and had a higher failure rate after restarting, but this did not reach statistical significance. Only dialysis vintage predicted technique failure. We conclude that, after severe peritonitis, patients should be given the choice to return to PD but risk stratification based on dialysis vintage is important. Patient retraining and creating a backup arteriovenous fistula might minimize morbidity in these high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND:Peritonitis remains the most important complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The success rate of restarting PD after severe peritonitis (peritonitis unresolved despite treatment with appropriate antibiotics for 3 days, or fungal or pseudomonas infections) is unclear. We wished to determine PD technique survival and overall mortality when PD is offered to these patients and to identify predictors of successful reinitiation. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 556 patients undergoing PD between January 2000 and December 2001. We collected demographic information from the 106 patients who had their PD catheter removed for peritonitis, details about their dialysis history and peritonitis, and whether they successfully restarted PD and if not, the reason. RESULTS: We divided patients into groups as follows: group 1 (n = 42) underwent catheter reinsertion, group 2 (n = 16) had no medical contraindication to restarting PD but the patients elected to remain on hemodialysis, group 3 (n = 35) were deemed medically unsuitable to return to PD, and group 4 (n = 13) were those that died within 4 weeks of presenting with peritonitis. If there were no medical contraindications, Indo-Asians were more likely to retry PD. In group 1, after a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 7.3 months, 23 of 42 patients restarted PD successfully. Technique survival for group 1 as a whole was 69% at 3 months and 55% at the end of follow-up. Patients of greater dialysis vintage were more likely to develop PD technique failure after restarting. Of those judged suitable for PD, there was no statistically significant difference in the mortality of patients who wished to either restart PD or remain on hemodialysis (group 1 vs group 2). Significant numbers of patients returned successfully to PD after pseudomonas and fungal peritonitis. CONCLUSION: Restarting PD after severe peritonitis was possible and safe. Ethnicity was an important predictor for wanting to retry PD, but not for technique failure: given the choice, Indo-Asians preferred PD and had a higher failure rate after restarting, but this did not reach statistical significance. Only dialysis vintage predicted technique failure. We conclude that, after severe peritonitis, patients should be given the choice to return to PD but risk stratification based on dialysis vintage is important. Patient retraining and creating a backup arteriovenous fistula might minimize morbidity in these high-risk patients.