BACKGROUND: Although several risk factors for cognitive decline have been identified, much less is known about factors that predict maintenance of cognitive function in advanced age. METHODS: We studied 2,509 well-functioning black and white elders enrolled in a prospective study. Cognitive function was measured using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline and years 3, 5, and 8. Random effects models were used to classify participants as cognitive maintainers (cognitive change slope > or = 0), minor decliners (slope < 0 and > 1 SD below mean), or major decliners (slope < or = 1 SD below mean). Logistic regression was used to identify domain-specific factors associated with being a maintainer vs a minor decliner. RESULTS: Over 8 years, 30% of the participants maintained cognitive function, 53% showed minor decline, and 16% had major cognitive decline. In the multivariate model, baseline variables significantly associated with being a maintainer vs a minor decliner were age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.77 per 5 years), white race (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.28), high school education level or greater (OR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.78-4.26), ninth grade literacy level or greater (OR = 4.85, 95% CI 3.00-7.87), weekly moderate/vigorous exercise (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.62), and not smoking (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.14-2.97). Variables associated with major cognitive decline compared to minor cognitive decline are reported. CONCLUSION: Elders who maintain cognitive function have a unique profile that differentiates them from those with minor decline. Importantly, some of these factors are modifiable and thus may be implemented in prevention programs to promote successful cognitive aging. Further, factors associated with maintenance may differ from factors associated with major cognitive decline, which may impact prevention vs treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND: Although several risk factors for cognitive decline have been identified, much less is known about factors that predict maintenance of cognitive function in advanced age. METHODS: We studied 2,509 well-functioning black and white elders enrolled in a prospective study. Cognitive function was measured using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline and years 3, 5, and 8. Random effects models were used to classify participants as cognitive maintainers (cognitive change slope > or = 0), minor decliners (slope < 0 and > 1 SD below mean), or major decliners (slope < or = 1 SD below mean). Logistic regression was used to identify domain-specific factors associated with being a maintainer vs a minor decliner. RESULTS: Over 8 years, 30% of the participants maintained cognitive function, 53% showed minor decline, and 16% had major cognitive decline. In the multivariate model, baseline variables significantly associated with being a maintainer vs a minor decliner were age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.77 per 5 years), white race (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.28), high school education level or greater (OR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.78-4.26), ninth grade literacy level or greater (OR = 4.85, 95% CI 3.00-7.87), weekly moderate/vigorous exercise (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.62), and not smoking (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.14-2.97). Variables associated with major cognitive decline compared to minor cognitive decline are reported. CONCLUSION: Elders who maintain cognitive function have a unique profile that differentiates them from those with minor decline. Importantly, some of these factors are modifiable and thus may be implemented in prevention programs to promote successful cognitive aging. Further, factors associated with maintenance may differ from factors associated with major cognitive decline, which may impact prevention vs treatment strategies.
Authors: Karlene Ball; Daniel B Berch; Karin F Helmers; Jared B Jobe; Mary D Leveck; Michael Marsiske; John N Morris; George W Rebok; David M Smith; Sharon L Tennstedt; Frederick W Unverzagt; Sherry L Willis Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ronica N Rooks; Eleanor M Simonsick; Toni Miles; Anne Newman; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Richard Schulz; Tamara Harris Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Reinhold Schmidt; Helena Schmidt; J David Curb; Kamal Masaki; Lon R White; Lenore J Launer Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Julie Loebach Wetherell; Hayley S Ripperger; Michelle Voegtle; Beau M Ances; David Balota; Emily S Bower; Colin Depp; Lisa Eyler; Erin R Foster; Denise Head; Tamara Hershey; Steven Hickman; Noralinda Kamantigue; Samuel Klein; J Philip Miller; Michael D Yingling; Jeanne Nichols; Ginger E Nicol; Bruce W Patterson; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Snyder; Mary Stephens; Susan Tate; Mary L Uhrich; David Wing; Gregory F Wu; Eric J Lenze Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: K I Erickson; C A Raji; O L Lopez; J T Becker; C Rosano; A B Newman; H M Gach; P M Thompson; A J Ho; L H Kuller Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Megan M Marron; Diane G Ives; Robert M Boudreau; Tamara B Harris; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Karin Fehsel; Tamara Schikowski; Michaela Jänner; Anke Hüls; Mohammed Voussoughi; Thomas Schulte; Andrea Vierkötter; Tom Teichert; Christian Herder; Dorothea Sugiri; Ursula Krämer; Christian Luckhaus Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 3.575