| Literature DB >> 20889865 |
James A Potts1, Stephen J Thomas, Anon Srikiatkhachorn, Pra-on Supradish, Wenjun Li, Ananda Nisalak, Suchitra Nimmannitya, Timothy P Endy, Daniel H Libraty, Robert V Gibbons, Sharone Green, Alan L Rothman, Siripen Kalayanarooj.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine retrospective dengue-illness classification using only clinical laboratory data, without relying on X-ray, ultrasound, or percent hemoconcentration. We analyzed data from a study of children who presented with acute febrile illness to two hospitals in Thailand. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to distinguish: (1) dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) versus dengue fever (DF), (2) DHF versus DF + other febrile illness (OFI), (3) dengue versus OFI, and (4) severe dengue versus non-severe dengue + OFI. Data from the second hospital served as a validation set. There were 1,227 patients in the analysis. The sensitivity of the models ranged from 89.2% (dengue versus OFI) to 79.6% (DHF versus DF). The models showed high sensitivity in the validation dataset. These models could be used to calculate a probability and classify patients based on readily available clinical laboratory data, and they will need to be validated in other dengue-endemic regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20889865 PMCID: PMC2946742 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345