| Literature DB >> 27391122 |
Suhendro Suwarto1, Leonard Nainggolan1, Robert Sinto1, Bonita Effendi2, Eppy Ibrahim3, Maulana Suryamin3, R Tedjo Sasmono4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are several limitations in diagnosing plasma leakage using the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines of dengue hemorrhagic fever. We conducted a study to develop a dengue scoring system to predict pleural effusion and/or ascites using routine laboratory parameters.Entities:
Keywords: AST ratio; Albumin; Ascites; Dengue score; Hematocrit; Platelet; Pleural effusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27391122 PMCID: PMC4938904 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1671-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Formulae for calculating the degrees of hemoconcentration, albuminemia, and the ratios of AST and ALT
Dengue infected-patients: comparison of patients with and without pleural effusion and/or ascites
| Variable | Without pleural effusion and/or ascites | With pleural effusion and/or ascites |
|---|---|---|
| Sex ( | 32/39 | 57/44 |
| Age (year)b | 21 (11) | 22 (12) |
| Dengue serotype | ||
| DENV-1 (%) | 20 (28.17) | 25 (24.75) |
| DENV-2 (%) | 27 (38.03) | 32 (31.69) |
| DENV-3 (%) | 17 (23.94) | 30 (29.70) |
| DENV-4 (%) | 7 (9.86) | 14 (13.86) |
| Degree of hemoconcentration (%)b | 12.67 (7.03)* | 18.92 (10.81)* |
| Lowest albumin concentration at critical phase (g/dL)b | 3.70 (0.35)* | 3.31 (0.46)* |
| Degree of hypoalbuminemia (%)b | 11.36 (9.00)* | 20.63 (12.67)* |
| Lowest platelet count (x 1,000/μL)b | 75.00 (66.00)* | 32.00 (31.50)* |
| Elevated ratio of ASTb | 1.80 (1.46)* | 3.11 (2.84)* |
| Elevated ratio of ALTb | 0.88 (1.00) * | 1.22 (1.16)* |
| Sodium concentration at critical phase (mEq/L)a | 135.37 ± 5.83 | 134.05 ± 5.09 |
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase
adata presented as the mean ± standard deviation
bdata presented as median (interquartile range)
*p < 0.05 by Mann Whitney test
Receiver operator curve characteristics for significant parameters in predicting pleural effusion and/or ascites diagnosis and cut off value for maximum sensitivity and specificity
| Variable | AROC (95 % CI) | Cut off | Sens (%) | Spe (%) | LR+ | LR- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree of hemoconcentration (%) | 0.74 (0.67–0.82) | ≥15.10 | 67.3 | 69 | 2.17 | 0.47 |
| Lowest albumin concentration at critical phase (mg/dL) | 0.78 (0.72–0.86) | ≤3.49 | 70 | 81.7 | 3.78 | 0.37 |
| Degree of hypoalbuminemia (%) | 0.76 (0.69–0.84) | ≥15.6 | 74.2 | 72.3 | 2.68 | 0.36 |
| Lowest platelet count (/μL) | 0.83 (0.76–0.89) | ≤49,500 | 72.3 | 76.1 | 3.02 | 0.36 |
| Elevated ratio of AST | 0.77 (0.70–0.85) | ≥2.51 | 70.1 | 74.29 | 2.72 | 0.40 |
| Elevated ratio of ALT | 0.63 (0.54–0.71) | ≥1.01 | 64.9 | 57.7 | 1.51 | 0.60 |
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, AROC area under receiving operating characteristic curve, LR- negative likelihood ratio, LR+ positive likelihood ratio, CI confident interval, Sens sensitivity, Spe specificity
Final multiple logistic regression model to predict pleural effusion and/or ascites
| Variable | Bivariate analysis | Multivariate adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio (95 % CI) |
| Coefficient | Odds ratio (95 % CI) |
| Dengue Score | |
| Degree of hemoconcentration ≥ 15.1 % | 4.30 (2.25–8.22) | <0.001 | 1.13 | 3.11 (1.41–6.88) | 0.005 | 1 |
| Lowest albumin concentration at critical phase ≤3.49 g/dL | 10.07 (4.83–21.01) | <0.001 | 1.50 | 4.48 (1.87–10.77) | 0.001 | 1 |
| Lowest platelet count ≤ 49,500/μL | 8.28 (4.12–16.64) | <0.001 | 1.28 | 3.62 (1.55–8.49) | 0.003 | 1 |
| Elevated ratio of AST ≥ 2.51 | 4.94 (2.54–9.62) | <0.001 | 0.98 | 2.67 (1.19–5.97) | 0.017 | 1 |
| Elevated ratio of ALT ≥ 1.01 | 2.50 (1.33–4.70) | 0.004 | ||||
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CI confident interval
The sensitivity and specificity of the Dengue Score at different cut offs
| Cut off | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Correctly Classified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥1 | 98.97 % | 40.85 % | 69.57 % | 96.67 % | 74.40 % |
| ≥2 | 82.47 % | 70.42 % | 79.21 % | 74.63 % | 77.38 % |
| ≥3 | 65.98 % | 88.73 % | 88.89 % | 65.63 % | 75.60 % |
| ≥4 | 26.80 % | 97.10 % | 92.86 % | 49.29 % | 56.55 % |
NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
Fig. 2Comparison of area receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves between the logistic regression model and Dengue Score