Literature DB >> 20888136

Validation and simplification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis classification for glioblastoma.

Jing Li1, Meihua Wang, Minhee Won, Edward G Shaw, Christopher Coughlin, Walter J Curran, Minesh P Mehta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patients with malignant glioma (glioblastoma multiforme [GBM] and anaplastic astrocytoma [AA]) produced six prognostic groups (I-VI) classified by six factors. We sought here to determine whether the classification for GBM could be improved by using an updated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) GBM database excluding AA and by considering additional baseline variables. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The new analysis considered 42 baseline variables and 1,672 GBM patients from the expanded RTOG glioma database. Patients receiving radiation only were excluded such that all patients received radiation+carmustine. "Radiation dose received" was replaced with "radiation dose assigned." The new RPA models were compared with the original model by applying them to a test dataset comprising 488 patients from six other RTOG trials. Fitness of the original and new models was evaluated using explained variation.
RESULTS: The original RPA model explained more variations in survival in the test dataset than did the new models (20% vs. 15%) and was therefore chosen for further analysis. It was reduced by combining Classes V and VI to produce three prognostic classes (Classes III, IV, and V+VI), as Classes V and VI had indistinguishable survival in the test dataset. The simplified model did not further improve performance (explained variation 18% vs. 20%) but is easier to apply because it involves only four variables: age, performance status, extent of resection, and neurologic function. Applying this simplified model to the updated GBM database resulted in three distinct classes with median survival times of 17.1, 11.2, and 7.5 months for Classes III, IV, and V+VI, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The final model, the simplified original RPA model combining Classes V and VI, resulted in three distinct prognostic groups defined by age, performance status, extent of resection, and neurologic function. This classification will be used in future RTOG GBM trials.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20888136      PMCID: PMC3783211          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  38 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Normand Laperriere; Lisa Zuraw; Gregory Cairncross
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  A qualitative discrepancy between censored data rank tests.

Authors:  R L Prentice; P Marek
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Phase II radiation therapy oncology group trial of weekly paclitaxel and conventional external beam radiation therapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  C J Langer; J Ruffer; H Rhodes; R Paulus; K Murray; B Movsas; W Curran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Implant volume as a prognostic variable in brachytherapy decision-making for malignant gliomas stratified by the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  G M Videtic; L E Gaspar; L Zamorano; L W Stitt; J Fontanesi; K J Levin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  Kathleen R Lamborn; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Phase II study of topotecan plus cranial radiation for glioblastoma multiforme: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9513.

Authors:  Barbara Fisher; M Won; David Macdonald; Douglas W Johnson; Wilson Roa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery.

Authors:  M D Walker; S B Green; D P Byar; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; G Owens; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Single-arm, open-label phase II study of intravenously administered tirapazamine and radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  J Del Rowe; C Scott; M Werner-Wasik; J P Bahary; W J Curran; R C Urtasun; B Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The use of hypofractionated intensity-modulated irradiation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary results of a prospective trial.

Authors:  Khalil Sultanem; Horacio Patrocinio; Christine Lambert; Robert Corns; Richard Leblanc; William Parker; George Shenouda; Luis Souhami
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Authors:  Patrick S Ward; Jay Patel; David R Wise; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Bryson D Bennett; Hilary A Coller; Justin R Cross; Valeria R Fantin; Cyrus V Hedvat; Alexander E Perl; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Martin Carroll; Shinsan M Su; Kim A Sharp; Ross L Levine; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 38.585

View more
  89 in total

1.  NRG oncology RTOG 9006: a phase III randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and BCNU versus standard RT and BCNU for malignant glioma patients.

Authors:  Arif N Ali; Peixin Zhang; W K Alfred Yung; Yuhchyau Chen; Benjamin Movsas; Raul C Urtasun; Christopher U Jones; Kwang N Choi; Jeff M Michalski; A Jennifer Fischbach; Arnold M Markoe; Christopher J Schultz; Marta Penas-Prado; Madhur K Garg; Alan C Hartford; Harold E Kim; Minhee Won; Walter J Curran
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Treatment outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide followed by bevacizumab salvage therapy in glioblastoma patients aged > 75 years.

Authors:  Ken-Ichiro Matsuda; Kaori Sakurada; Kenji Nemoto; Takamasa Kayama; Yukihiko Sonoda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Treatment outcomes in glioblastoma patients aged 76 years or older: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takeo Uzuka; Kenichiro Asano; Toshio Sasajima; Kaori Sakurada; Toshihiro Kumabe; Takaaki Beppu; Masahiro Ichikawa; Chifumi Kitanaka; Hiroshi Aoki; Kiyoshi Saito; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Teiji Tominaga; Kazuo Mizoi; Hiroki Ohkuma; Yukihiko Fujii; Takamasa Kayama
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  The development of dendritic cell vaccine-based immunotherapies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Duane A Mitchell
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 9.623

5.  An overview of neuro-oncology research and practice in Iran, three years with the NOSC initiative.

Authors:  Peiman Haddad; Sohrab Shazadi; Farhad Samiei; Homayoun Hadizadeh Kharrazi; Morteza Tabatabaeefar; Afshin Rakhsha; Mohammad Faranoosh; Mohammad Torabi-Nami; Ali Dadras; Atieh Liaghi; Leila Nafarieh
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

Review 6.  Treating glioblastoma in the elderly.

Authors:  Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya; Jean-Yves Delattre
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2012-11

Review 7.  Treating glioblastoma patients with poor performance status: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya; François Ducray
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-05

8.  Beating the odds: extreme long-term survival with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Rameen Beroukhim
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Recurrent glioblastomas in the elderly after maximal first-line treatment: does preserved overall condition warrant a maximal second-line treatment?

Authors:  Marc Zanello; Alexandre Roux; Renata Ursu; Sophie Peeters; Luc Bauchet; Georges Noel; Jacques Guyotat; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Thierry Faillot; Fabien Litre; Nicolas Desse; Evelyne Emery; Antoine Petit; Johann Peltier; Jimmy Voirin; François Caire; Jean-Luc Barat; Jean-Rodolphe Vignes; Philippe Menei; Olivier Langlois; Edouard Dezamis; Antoine Carpentier; Phong Dam Hieu; Philippe Metellus; Johan Pallud
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Tumor prognostic factors and the challenge of developing predictive factors.

Authors:  Emma B Holliday; Erik P Sulman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.