Literature DB >> 393312

A qualitative discrepancy between censored data rank tests.

R L Prentice, P Marek.   

Abstract

Two popular censored data rank tests were used to compare cancer incidence rates between dogs receiving bone marrow transplantation and control dogs. The logrank test gave a significance level of 0.01. In contrast, Gehan's generalized Wilcoxon test gave a significance level of 0.76. The statistics are displayed in a manner that shows how such contrasting significance levels can arise. The Gehan statistic is shown to be subject to a serious criticism that does not apply to other Wilcoxon generalizations. Further insight into the data is obtained using a time-dependent logrank test and the proportional hazards regression model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 393312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Statistical needs in national water quality monitoring programs.

Authors:  R E Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Martingales without tears.

Authors:  K K Lan; J M Lachin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  An asymptotic analysis of the logrank test.

Authors:  R L Strawderman
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Clinical behavior of untreated axillary nodes after local treatment for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  N Baxter; D McCready; J A Chapman; E Fish; H Kahn; W Hanna; M Trudeau; H L Lickley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Partitioned log-rank tests for the overall homogeneity of hazard rate functions.

Authors:  Yukun Liu; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Mesothelioma patients with germline BAP1 mutations have 7-fold improved long-term survival.

Authors:  Francine Baumann; Erin Flores; Andrea Napolitano; Shreya Kanodia; Emanuela Taioli; Harvey Pass; Haining Yang; Michele Carbone
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Validation and simplification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis classification for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jing Li; Meihua Wang; Minhee Won; Edward G Shaw; Christopher Coughlin; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The Sydney Multicentre Study of Parkinson's disease: a randomised, prospective five year study comparing low dose bromocriptine with low dose levodopa-carbidopa.

Authors:  M A Hely; J G Morris; W G Reid; D J O'Sullivan; P M Williamson; D Rail; G A Broe; S Margrie
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Factors associated with local breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy alone.

Authors:  D R McCready; W Hanna; H Kahn; J A Chapman; J Wall; E B Fish; H L Lickley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Effect of quantitative nuclear image features on recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Authors:  David E Axelrod; Naomi A Miller; H Lavina Lickley; Jin Qian; William A Christens-Barry; Yan Yuan; Yuejiao Fu; Judith-Anne W Chapman
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.