Literature DB >> 29404979

NRG oncology RTOG 9006: a phase III randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and BCNU versus standard RT and BCNU for malignant glioma patients.

Arif N Ali1, Peixin Zhang2, W K Alfred Yung3, Yuhchyau Chen4, Benjamin Movsas5, Raul C Urtasun6, Christopher U Jones7, Kwang N Choi8, Jeff M Michalski9, A Jennifer Fischbach10, Arnold M Markoe11, Christopher J Schultz12, Marta Penas-Prado3, Madhur K Garg13, Alan C Hartford14, Harold E Kim15, Minhee Won2, Walter J Curran16.   

Abstract

From 1990 to 1994, patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas were enrolled and randomized between hyperfractionated radiation (HFX) of 72.0 Gy in 60 fractions given twice daily and 60.0 Gy in 30 fractions given once daily. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of 1,3 bis(2 chloroethyl)-1 nitrosourea on days 1-3 q8 weeks for 1 year. Patients were stratified by age, KPS, and histology. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Out of the 712 patients accrued, 694 (97.5%) were analyzable cases (350 HFX, 344 standard arm). There was no significant difference between the arms on overall acute or late treatment-related toxicity. No statistically significant effect for HFX, as compared to standard therapy, was found on either OS, with a median survival time (MST) of 11.3 versus 13.1 months (p = 0.20) or PFS, with a median PFS time of 5.7 versus 6.9 months (p = 0.18). The treatment effect on OS remained insignificant based on the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.16; p = 0.0682). When OS was analyzed by histology subgroup there was also no significant difference between the two arms for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (MST: 10.3 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.34), anaplastic astrocytoma (MST: 69.8 vs. 50.0 months; p = 0.91) or anaplastic oligodendroglioma (MST: 92.1 vs. 66.5 months; p = 0.33). Though this trial provided many invaluable secondary analyses, there was no trend or indication of a benefit to HFX radiation to 72.0 Gy in any subset of malignant glioma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Astrocytoma; GBM; Glioma; Hyperfractionated; Oligodendroglioma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29404979      PMCID: PMC6020014          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2558-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  22 in total

1.  Does stereotactic eligibility for the treatment of glioblastoma cause selection bias in randomized studies?

Authors:  Robert A Lustig; Charles B Scott; Walter J Curran
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 2.  The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Accelerated fractionation vs hyperfractionation: rationales for several treatments per day.

Authors:  H D Thames; L J Peters; H R Withers; G H Fletcher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: A retrospective review of radiation therapy oncology group protocols comparing survival with carmustine or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M D Prados; C Scott; W J Curran; D F Nelson; S Leibel; S Kramer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Validation and predictive power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis classes for malignant glioma patients: a report using RTOG 90-06.

Authors:  C B Scott; C Scarantino; R Urtasun; B Movsas; C U Jones; J R Simpson; A J Fischbach; W J Curran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial.

Authors:  M D Walker; E Alexander; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; H A Norrell; G Owens; J Ransohoff; C B Wilson; E A Gehan; T A Strike
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials.

Authors:  W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery.

Authors:  M D Walker; S B Green; D P Byar; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; G Owens; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Short delay in initiation of radiotherapy may not affect outcome of patients with glioblastoma: a secondary analysis from the radiation therapy oncology group database.

Authors:  Deborah T Blumenthal; Minhee Won; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran; Luis Souhami; Jeff M Michalski; C Leland Rogers; Benjamin W Corn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Radiation response of the central nervous system.

Authors:  T E Schultheiss; L E Kun; K K Ang; L C Stephens
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  9 in total

1.  External beam radiation dose escalation for high grade glioma.

Authors:  Luluel Khan; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; James Perry; Wei Xu; May N Tsao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-21

2.  Multi-Planar VMAT Plans for High-Grade Glioma and Glioblastoma Targeting the Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis Sparing.

Authors:  Eva Y W Cheung; Shirley S H Ng; Sapphire H Y Yung; Dominic Y T Cheng; Fandy Y C Chan; Janice K Y Cheng
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  Long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, for glioma.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; David Gillespie; Therese Dowswell; Jonathan Evans; Sara Erridge; Luke Vale; Ashleigh Kernohan; Robin Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 4.  Advances in radiotherapy and comprehensive treatment of high-grade glioma: immunotherapy and tumor-treating fields.

Authors:  Shiyu Liu; Qin Zhao; Weiyan Shi; Zhuangzhuang Zheng; Zijing Liu; Lingbin Meng; Lihua Dong; Xin Jiang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Temozolomide Combined with Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Malignant Glioma.

Authors:  Shoufeng Wei; Junde Li
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 6.  Glioblastoma - treatment and obstacles.

Authors:  Farley Soares Cantidio; Gabriel Oliveira Bernardes Gil; Izabella Nobre Queiroz; Marcos Regalin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-09-19

Review 7.  Imaging of GBM in the Age of Molecular Markers and MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Salah Dajani; Virginia B Hill; John A Kalapurakal; Craig M Horbinski; Eric G Nesbit; Sean Sachdev; Amulya Yalamanchili; Tarita O Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Victor Lewitzki; Rainer J Klement; Rebekka Kosmala; Dominik Lisowski; Michael Flentje; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Accelerated hyper-versus normofractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Rainer J Klement; Ilinca Popp; David Kaul; Felix Ehret; Anca L Grosu; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Victor Lewitzki
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.130

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.