BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in health care are widespread in the United States. Identifying contributing factors may improve care for underserved minorities. To the extent that differential utilization of services, based on need or biological effect, contributes to outcome disparities, prospective payment systems may require inclusion of race to minimize these adverse effects. This research determines whether costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) care varied by race and whether this variance affected payments to dialysis facilities. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the classification of race across Medicare databases and investigated differences in cost of care for long-term dialysis patients by race. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare ESRD database including 890,776 patient-years in 2004-2006. PREDICTORS: Patient race and ethnicity. OUTCOMES: Costs associated with ESRD care and estimated payments to dialysis facilities under a prospective payment system. RESULTS: There were inconsistencies in race and ethnicity classification; however, there was significant agreement for classification of black and nonblack race across databases. In predictive models evaluating the cost of outpatient dialysis care for Medicare patients, race is a significant predictor of cost, particularly for cost of separately billed injectable medications used in dialysis. Overall, black patients had 9% higher costs than nonblack patients. In a model that did not adjust for race, other patient characteristics accounted for only 31% of this difference. LIMITATIONS: Lack of information about biological causes of the link between race and cost. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant racial difference in the cost of providing dialysis care that is not accounted for by other factors that may be used to adjust payments. This difference has the potential to affect the delivery of care to certain populations. Of note, inclusion of race into a prospective payment system will require better understanding of biological differences in bone and anemia outcomes, as well as effects of inclusion on self-reported race.
BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in health care are widespread in the United States. Identifying contributing factors may improve care for underserved minorities. To the extent that differential utilization of services, based on need or biological effect, contributes to outcome disparities, prospective payment systems may require inclusion of race to minimize these adverse effects. This research determines whether costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) care varied by race and whether this variance affected payments to dialysis facilities. STUDY DESIGN: We compared the classification of race across Medicare databases and investigated differences in cost of care for long-term dialysis patients by race. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare ESRD database including 890,776 patient-years in 2004-2006. PREDICTORS: Patient race and ethnicity. OUTCOMES: Costs associated with ESRD care and estimated payments to dialysis facilities under a prospective payment system. RESULTS: There were inconsistencies in race and ethnicity classification; however, there was significant agreement for classification of black and nonblack race across databases. In predictive models evaluating the cost of outpatient dialysis care for Medicare patients, race is a significant predictor of cost, particularly for cost of separately billed injectable medications used in dialysis. Overall, black patients had 9% higher costs than nonblack patients. In a model that did not adjust for race, other patient characteristics accounted for only 31% of this difference. LIMITATIONS: Lack of information about biological causes of the link between race and cost. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant racial difference in the cost of providing dialysis care that is not accounted for by other factors that may be used to adjust payments. This difference has the potential to affect the delivery of care to certain populations. Of note, inclusion of race into a prospective payment system will require better understanding of biological differences in bone and anemia outcomes, as well as effects of inclusion on self-reported race.
Authors: Kushang V Patel; Dan L Longo; William B Ershler; Binbing Yu; Richard D Semba; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Grace H Lee; Jessica E Miller; Elani Streja; Jennie Jing; John A Robertson; Csaba P Kovesdy Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Vimal K Derebail; Eduardo K Lacson; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Nigel S Key; Susan L Hogan; Raymond M Hakim; Ann Mooney; Chinu M Jani; Curtis Johnson; Yichun Hu; Ronald J Falk; J Michael Lazarus Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Keith C Norris; Sandra F Williams; Connie M Rhee; Susanne B Nicholas; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; L Ebony Boulware Journal: Semin Dial Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Vimal K Derebail; Patrick H Nachman; Nigel S Key; Heather Ansede; Ronald J Falk; Wayne D Rosamond; Abhijit V Kshirsagar Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Marc N Turenne; Elizabeth L Cope; Shannon Porenta; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Douglas S Fuller; Jeffrey M Pearson; Claudia Dahlerus; Brett Lantz; Francesca Tentori; Bruce M Robinson Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Douglas S Fuller; Shan Xing; Vasily Belozeroff; Alon Yehoshua; Hal Morgenstern; Bruce M Robinson; Robert J Rubin; Nisha Bhatt; Ronald L Pisoni Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 8.237