Douglas S Fuller1, Shan Xing2, Vasily Belozeroff2, Alon Yehoshua2, Hal Morgenstern3,4,5, Bruce M Robinson6, Robert J Rubin7, Nisha Bhatt2, Ronald L Pisoni6. 1. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; doug.fuller@arborresearch.org. 2. Global Health Economics, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 3. Departments of Epidemiology and. 4. Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, and. 5. Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and. 6. Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 7. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Calcimimetic drugs used to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism are being considered for inclusion in the Medicare ESRD Prospective Payment System bundle after an evaluation period. Understanding of utilization patterns of calcimimetics across dialysis facilities may help align financial incentives with clinical objectives. Our study's purpose was to describe the distribution of cinacalcet prescription across United States hemodialysis facilities and to explore factors that may influence cinacalcet utilization. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used monthly cross-sectional data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study in 2014 to characterize the distribution of cinacalcet prescription across 203 United States hemodialysis facilities (10,521 patients). On the basis of associations with parathyroid hormone levels from patient-level analyses, we used linear mixed-effects regressions to estimate the associations between three facility-level exposures (black race, <65 years old, and having ≥3 years on dialysis [vintage]) and the prevalence of cinacalcet prescription, adjusting for facility- and patient-level potential confounders. RESULTS: The mean percentage of patients in each facility with cinacalcet prescription was 23% in June 2014 (median, 22%; interquartile range, 13%-30%). Adjusted for facility-level and nonexposure patient-level variables, the difference in prevalence of cinacalcet prescription between facilities with the highest and lowest quartiles of percentage of black patients was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.8% to 14.8%; P for trend =0.03). The adjusted prevalence difference was 7.3% for the percentage of patients aged <65 years (95% CI, -0.1% to 14.7%; P for trend =0.06) and 11.9% for the percentage of patients with ≥3 years of dialysis (95% CI, 2.4% to 21.4%; P for trend =0.02). These associations changed appreciably, becoming much weaker or even reversing, after further adjusting for the patient-level exposure variables. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities treating more patients who are black, under age 65 years, and having dialysis vintage ≥3 years have higher average levels of cinacalcet prescription. However, these differences were strongly attenuated after accounting for the unbalanced distributions of these patient case-mix variables.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Calcimimetic drugs used to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism are being considered for inclusion in the Medicare ESRD Prospective Payment System bundle after an evaluation period. Understanding of utilization patterns of calcimimetics across dialysis facilities may help align financial incentives with clinical objectives. Our study's purpose was to describe the distribution of cinacalcet prescription across United States hemodialysis facilities and to explore factors that may influence cinacalcet utilization. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used monthly cross-sectional data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study in 2014 to characterize the distribution of cinacalcet prescription across 203 United States hemodialysis facilities (10,521 patients). On the basis of associations with parathyroid hormone levels from patient-level analyses, we used linear mixed-effects regressions to estimate the associations between three facility-level exposures (black race, <65 years old, and having ≥3 years on dialysis [vintage]) and the prevalence of cinacalcet prescription, adjusting for facility- and patient-level potential confounders. RESULTS: The mean percentage of patients in each facility with cinacalcet prescription was 23% in June 2014 (median, 22%; interquartile range, 13%-30%). Adjusted for facility-level and nonexposure patient-level variables, the difference in prevalence of cinacalcet prescription between facilities with the highest and lowest quartiles of percentage of black patients was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.8% to 14.8%; P for trend =0.03). The adjusted prevalence difference was 7.3% for the percentage of patients aged <65 years (95% CI, -0.1% to 14.7%; P for trend =0.06) and 11.9% for the percentage of patients with ≥3 years of dialysis (95% CI, 2.4% to 21.4%; P for trend =0.02). These associations changed appreciably, becoming much weaker or even reversing, after further adjusting for the patient-level exposure variables. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities treating more patients who are black, under age 65 years, and having dialysis vintage ≥3 years have higher average levels of cinacalcet prescription. However, these differences were strongly attenuated after accounting for the unbalanced distributions of these patient case-mix variables.
Authors: Geoffrey A Block; David A Bushinsky; Sunfa Cheng; John Cunningham; Bastian Dehmel; Tilman B Drueke; Markus Ketteler; Reshma Kewalramani; Kevin J Martin; Sharon M Moe; Uptal D Patel; Justin Silver; Yan Sun; Hao Wang; Glenn M Chertow Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Geoffrey A Block; David A Bushinsky; John Cunningham; Tilman B Drueke; Markus Ketteler; Reshma Kewalramani; Kevin J Martin; T Christian Mix; Sharon M Moe; Uptal D Patel; Justin Silver; David M Spiegel; Lulu Sterling; Liron Walsh; Glenn M Chertow Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Steven M Brunelli; Keri L Monda; John M Burkart; Matthew Gitlin; Peter J Neumann; Grace S Park; Margarita Symonian-Silver; Susan Yue; Brian D Bradbury; Robert J Rubin Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Britt B Newsome; Ryan D Kilpatrick; Jiannong Liu; David Zaun; Craig A Solid; Kimberly Nieman; Wendy L St Peter Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Julia Spoendlin; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Theodore Tsacogianis; Julie M Paik; Michael A Fischer; Seoyoung C Kim; Rishi J Desai Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Ronald L Pisoni; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Eric W Young; Tadao Akizawa; Yasushi Asano; Francesco Locatelli; Juergen Bommer; Jose Miguel Cruz; Peter G Kerr; David C Mendelssohn; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Marc N Turenne; Elizabeth L Cope; Shannon Porenta; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Douglas S Fuller; Jeffrey M Pearson; Claudia Dahlerus; Brett Lantz; Francesca Tentori; Bruce M Robinson Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mark D Danese; Marc Halperin; Kimberly A Lowe; Brian D Bradbury; Thy P Do; Geoffrey A Block Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Aarti Mathur; JiYoon B Ahn; Whitney Sutton; Martha A Zeiger; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Surgery Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Rasheeda Hall; Alyssa Platt; Jonathan Wilson; Patti L Ephraim; Angelina S Hwang; Angel Chen; Daniel E Weiner; L Ebony Boulware; Jane Pendergast; Julia J Scialla Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Aarti Mathur; Whitney Sutton; JiYoon B Ahn; Jason D Prescott; Martha A Zeiger; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Transplantation Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Jessica B Kendrick; Meijiao Zhou; Linda H Ficociello; Vidhya Parameswaran; Claudy Mullon; Michael S Anger; Daniel W Coyne Journal: Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis Date: 2022-04-11
Authors: Kevin Chan; Angelo Karaboyas; Hal Morgenstern; Bruce M Robinson; Friedrich K Port; Stefan H Jacobson; Masafumi Fukagawa; Yvonne Meier; Philipp A Csomor; Ronald L Pisoni Journal: Kidney Med Date: 2019-05-10