PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to present IBIS (Interactive Brain Imaging System) NeuroNav, a new prototype neuronavigation system that has been developed in our research laboratory over the past decade that uses tracked intraoperative ultrasound to address surgical navigation issues related to brain shift. The unique feature of the system is its ability, when needed, to improve the initial patient-to-preoperative image alignment based on the intraoperative ultrasound data. Parts of IBIS Neuronav source code are now publicly available on-line. METHODS: Four aspects of the system are characterized in this paper: the ultrasound probe calibration, the temporal calibration, the patient-to-image registration and the MRI-ultrasound registration. In order to characterize its real clinical precision and accuracy, the system was tested in a series of adult brain tumor cases. RESULTS: Three metrics were computed to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the ultrasound calibration. 1) Reproducibility: 1.77 mm and 1.65 mm for the bottom corners of the ultrasound image, 2) point reconstruction precision 0.62-0.90 mm: and 3) point reconstruction accuracy: 0.49-0.74 mm. The temporal calibration error was estimated to be 0.82 ms. The mean fiducial registration error (FRE) of the homologous-point-based patient-to-MRI registration for our clinical data is 4.9 ± 1.1 mm. After the skin landmark-based registration, the mean misalignment between the ultrasound and MR images in the tumor region is 6.1 ± 3.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The components and functionality of a new prototype system are described and its precision and accuracy evaluated. It was found to have an accuracy similar to other comparable systems in the literature.
PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to present IBIS (Interactive Brain Imaging System) NeuroNav, a new prototype neuronavigation system that has been developed in our research laboratory over the past decade that uses tracked intraoperative ultrasound to address surgical navigation issues related to brain shift. The unique feature of the system is its ability, when needed, to improve the initial patient-to-preoperative image alignment based on the intraoperative ultrasound data. Parts of IBIS Neuronav source code are now publicly available on-line. METHODS: Four aspects of the system are characterized in this paper: the ultrasound probe calibration, the temporal calibration, the patient-to-image registration and the MRI-ultrasound registration. In order to characterize its real clinical precision and accuracy, the system was tested in a series of adult brain tumor cases. RESULTS: Three metrics were computed to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the ultrasound calibration. 1) Reproducibility: 1.77 mm and 1.65 mm for the bottom corners of the ultrasound image, 2) point reconstruction precision 0.62-0.90 mm: and 3) point reconstruction accuracy: 0.49-0.74 mm. The temporal calibration error was estimated to be 0.82 ms. The mean fiducial registration error (FRE) of the homologous-point-based patient-to-MRI registration for our clinical data is 4.9 ± 1.1 mm. After the skin landmark-based registration, the mean misalignment between the ultrasound and MR images in the tumor region is 6.1 ± 3.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The components and functionality of a new prototype system are described and its precision and accuracy evaluated. It was found to have an accuracy similar to other comparable systems in the literature.
Authors: A Gronningsaeter; A Kleven; S Ommedal; T E Aarseth; T Lie; F Lindseth; T Langø; G Unsgård Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Peter Hastreiter; Christof Rezk-Salama; Grzegorz Soza; Michael Bauer; Günther Greiner; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Oliver Ganslandt; Christopher Nimsky Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: H Iseki; H Kawamura; T Tanikawa; H Kawabatake; T Taira; K Takakura; T Dohi; N Hata Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 1994 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Charles X B Yan; Benoît Goulet; Sean Jy-Shyang Chen; Donatella Tampieri; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Hui Ming Khoo; Nicolás von Ellenrieder; Natalja Zazubovits; Daniel He; François Dubeau; Jean Gotman Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Inês Machado; Matthew Toews; Elizabeth George; Prashin Unadkat; Walid Essayed; Jie Luo; Pedro Teodoro; Herculano Carvalho; Jorge Martins; Polina Golland; Steve Pieper; Sarah Frisken; Alexandra Golby; William Wells Iii; Yangming Ou Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Yiming Xiao; Charles Xiao Bo Yan; Simon Drouin; Dante De Nigris; Anna Kochanowska; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Simon Drouin; Anna Kochanowska; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Ian J Gerard; Rina Zelmann; Dante De Nigris; Silvain Bériault; Tal Arbel; Denis Sirhan; Abbas F Sadikot; Jeffery A Hall; David S Sinclair; Kevin Petrecca; Rolando F DelMaestro; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Ian J Gerard; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Simon Drouin; Jeffery A Hall; Kevin Petrecca; Dante De Nigris; Daniel A Di Giovanni; Tal Arbel; D Louis Collins Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-26