PURPOSE: Image-guided spine surgery requires registration of the patient anatomy and preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. A technique for intraoperative ultrasound image registration to preoperative CT scans was developed and tested. Validation of the ultrasound-CT registration technique was performed using porcine cadavers. METHODS: An ultrasound-CT registration technique was evaluated using 18 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of 3 porcine cadavers with 10 different sweep patterns for ultrasound acquisition. For each sweep pattern at each vertebra, 100 randomly simulated initial misalignments were introduced. Each misalignment was registered. The resulting registration transformations were compared to gold standard registrations based on implanted fiducials to assess accuracy and robustness of the technique. RESULTS: The orthogonal-sweep acquisition was found to perform best and yielded a registration accuracy of 1.65 mm across all vertebrae on all porcine cadavers, where 82.5% of the registrations resulted in target registration errors below the 2 mm threshold recommended by a joint report from the experts in the field. In addition, we found that registration accuracy varies by the sweep pattern and vertebral level, but neighboring vertebrae tend to result in statistically similar accuracy. Ultrasound-CT registration took an average of 2.5 min to run, and the total registration time per vertebra (also including time for ultrasound acquisition and reconstruction) is approximately 8 min. CONCLUSIONS: A previously described ultrasound-CT registration technique yields clinically acceptable accuracy and robustness on multiple vertebrae across multiple porcine cadavers. The total registration time is shorter than that of surface point-based manual registration.
PURPOSE: Image-guided spine surgery requires registration of the patient anatomy and preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. A technique for intraoperative ultrasound image registration to preoperative CT scans was developed and tested. Validation of the ultrasound-CT registration technique was performed using porcine cadavers. METHODS: An ultrasound-CT registration technique was evaluated using 18 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of 3 porcine cadavers with 10 different sweep patterns for ultrasound acquisition. For each sweep pattern at each vertebra, 100 randomly simulated initial misalignments were introduced. Each misalignment was registered. The resulting registration transformations were compared to gold standard registrations based on implanted fiducials to assess accuracy and robustness of the technique. RESULTS: The orthogonal-sweep acquisition was found to perform best and yielded a registration accuracy of 1.65 mm across all vertebrae on all porcine cadavers, where 82.5% of the registrations resulted in target registration errors below the 2 mm threshold recommended by a joint report from the experts in the field. In addition, we found that registration accuracy varies by the sweep pattern and vertebral level, but neighboring vertebrae tend to result in statistically similar accuracy. Ultrasound-CT registration took an average of 2.5 min to run, and the total registration time per vertebra (also including time for ultrasound acquisition and reconstruction) is approximately 8 min. CONCLUSIONS: A previously described ultrasound-CT registration technique yields clinically acceptable accuracy and robustness on multiple vertebrae across multiple porcine cadavers. The total registration time is shorter than that of surface point-based manual registration.
Authors: K Cleary; J Anderson; M Brazaitis; G Devey; A DiGioia; M Freedman; D Grönemeyer; C Lathan; H Lemke; D Long; S K Mun; R Taylor Journal: Comput Aided Surg Date: 2000
Authors: Laurence Mercier; Rolando F Del Maestro; Kevin Petrecca; Anna Kochanowska; Simon Drouin; Charles X B Yan; Andrew L Janke; Sean Jy-Shyang Chen; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: G P Penney; D C Barratt; C S K Chan; M Slomczykowski; T J Carter; P J Edwards; D J Hawkes Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Dean C Barratt; Carolyn S K Chan; Philip J Edwards; Graeme P Penney; Mike Slomczykowski; Timothy J Carter; David J Hawkes Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2008-01-29 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Charles X B Yan; Benoît Goulet; Donatella Tampieri; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Songbai Ji; Xiaoyao Fan; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Sohail K Mirza; S Scott Lollis Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Simon Drouin; Anna Kochanowska; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Ian J Gerard; Rina Zelmann; Dante De Nigris; Silvain Bériault; Tal Arbel; Denis Sirhan; Abbas F Sadikot; Jeffery A Hall; David S Sinclair; Kevin Petrecca; Rolando F DelMaestro; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Songbai Ji; Xiaoyao Fan; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Sohail K Mirza; S Scott Lollis Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Houssem-Eddine Gueziri; Simon Drouin; Charles X B Yan; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Yunliang Cai; Shaoju Wu; Xiaoyao Fan; Jonathan Olson; Linton Evans; Scott Lollis; Sohail K Mirza; Keith D Paulsen; Songbai Ji Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 3.421