AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The ability to measure insulin sensitivity across the phenotypic spectrum of diabetes may contribute to a more accurate characterisation of diabetes type. Our goal was to develop and validate an insulin sensitivity (IS) score using the euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp in a subset (n = 85) of 12- to 19-year-old youths with diabetes participating in the SEARCH study in Colorado, USA. METHODS: Youths with a diagnosis of type 1 (n = 60) or type 2 diabetes (n = 25) underwent a 3 h clamp to measure glucose disposal rate (GDR, mg kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). Demographic (age, sex, race), clinical (BMI, waist, Tanner stage) and metabolic characteristics (HbA₁(c), lipids, blood pressure, urine albumin:creatinine) were used to estimate log(e)IS score via stepwise linear regression on a model-development set (n = 53). Estimated IS score was evaluated for reproducibility on two validation sets: youths with diabetes (n = 33) and healthy control youths (n = 22). RESULTS: The best model included waist, triacylglycerol (TG) and HbA₁(c) levels (R² = 0.74). Diabetes type did not enter the model and there were no significant interactions between diabetes type and other predictors. Estimated IS score correlated well (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001; r = 0.62, p = 0.002) with GDR on the two validation sets. Based on this analysis, we propose the following formula to estimate insulin sensitivity in youths with diabetes: [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Insulin sensitivity can be estimated in adolescents with diabetes using routinely collected measures. This score can be applied to epidemiological studies of youths with diabetes to characterise relationships between dimensions of diabetes type.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The ability to measure insulin sensitivity across the phenotypic spectrum of diabetes may contribute to a more accurate characterisation of diabetes type. Our goal was to develop and validate an insulin sensitivity (IS) score using the euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp in a subset (n = 85) of 12- to 19-year-old youths with diabetes participating in the SEARCH study in Colorado, USA. METHODS: Youths with a diagnosis of type 1 (n = 60) or type 2 diabetes (n = 25) underwent a 3 h clamp to measure glucose disposal rate (GDR, mg kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). Demographic (age, sex, race), clinical (BMI, waist, Tanner stage) and metabolic characteristics (HbA₁(c), lipids, blood pressure, urine albumin:creatinine) were used to estimate log(e)IS score via stepwise linear regression on a model-development set (n = 53). Estimated IS score was evaluated for reproducibility on two validation sets: youths with diabetes (n = 33) and healthy control youths (n = 22). RESULTS: The best model included waist, triacylglycerol (TG) and HbA₁(c) levels (R² = 0.74). Diabetes type did not enter the model and there were no significant interactions between diabetes type and other predictors. Estimated IS score correlated well (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001; r = 0.62, p = 0.002) with GDR on the two validation sets. Based on this analysis, we propose the following formula to estimate insulin sensitivity in youths with diabetes: [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Insulin sensitivity can be estimated in adolescents with diabetes using routinely collected measures. This score can be applied to epidemiological studies of youths with diabetes to characterise relationships between dimensions of diabetes type.
Authors: Ezio Bonifacio; Liping Yu; Alastair K Williams; George S Eisenbarth; Polly J Bingley; Santica M Marcovina; Kerstin Adler; Anette G Ziegler; Patricia W Mueller; Desmond A Schatz; Jeffrey P Krischer; Michael W Steffes; Beena Akolkar Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Ronny A Bell; Ralph B D'Agostino; Giuseppina Imperatore; Judith M Johansen; Barbara Linder; Lenna L Liu; Beth Loots; Santica Marcovina; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; David J Pettitt; Beth Waitzfelder Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Jean M Lawrence; Dana Dabelea; Jasmin Divers; Scott Isom; Lawrence Dolan; Giuseppina Imperatore; Barbara Linder; Santica Marcovina; David J Pettitt; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon Saydah; Lynne Wagenknecht Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Jeanette M Stafford; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Ralph D'Agostino; Lawrence Dolan; Giuseppina Imperatore; Barbara Linder; Jean M Lawrence; Santica M Marcovina; Amy K Mottl; Mary Helen Black; Rodica Pop-Busui; Sharon Saydah; Richard F Hamman; Catherine Pihoker Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Petter Bjornstad; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Kimberly McFann; R Paul Wadwa; Marian Rewers; Christopher J Rivard; Diana Jalal; Michel B Chonchol; Richard J Johnson; David M Maahs Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: N S The; C M Shay; A P Lamichhane; T L Crume; J L Crandell; S Wang; D Dabelea; J M Lawrence; E J Mayer-Davis Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Catherine Pihoker; Lisa K Gilliam; Sian Ellard; Dana Dabelea; Cralen Davis; Lawrence M Dolan; Carla J Greenbaum; Giuseppina Imperatore; Jean M Lawrence; Santica M Marcovina; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Andrea K Steck; Desmond E Williams; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 5.958