CONTEXT: The workplace may be an ideal venue for engaging African American women in behavioral interventions for weight reduction. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced EatRight dietary intervention among a group of predominately African American women in a workplace setting. DESIGN: Crossover design study. SETTING: Workplace. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 39 women volunteered for this study, of whom 27 completed it. INTERVENTION: The control period involved observation of participants for 22 weeks after receiving standard counseling on lifestyle methods to achieve a healthy weight; following the control period, participants crossed over to the 22-week intervention period. The intervention was culturally enhanced using feedback derived from formative assessment and delivered as 15 group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the difference in weight change between the control and intervention periods; changes in waist circumference and quality of life were secondary outcomes. RESULTS:Most participants were obese, with a mean baseline body mass index of 36 kg/m², weight of 97.9 kg, and waist circumference of 111 cm. Weight increased during the control period by 0.7 kg but decreased by 2.6 kg during the intervention (net difference = -3.4 kg, P <.001), with 30% of participants losing 5% or more of body weight. Compared to the control period, there was a significant decrease in waist circumference (-3.6 cm, P =.006) and improvement in weight-related quality of life (5.7, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a culturally enhanced behavioral weight loss intervention in a predominately African American workplace setting. The workplace may be conducive for targeting African American women who are disproportionately affected by obesity.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: The workplace may be an ideal venue for engaging African American women in behavioral interventions for weight reduction. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced EatRight dietary intervention among a group of predominately African American women in a workplace setting. DESIGN: Crossover design study. SETTING: Workplace. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 39 women volunteered for this study, of whom 27 completed it. INTERVENTION: The control period involved observation of participants for 22 weeks after receiving standard counseling on lifestyle methods to achieve a healthy weight; following the control period, participants crossed over to the 22-week intervention period. The intervention was culturally enhanced using feedback derived from formative assessment and delivered as 15 group sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the difference in weight change between the control and intervention periods; changes in waist circumference and quality of life were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Most participants were obese, with a mean baseline body mass index of 36 kg/m², weight of 97.9 kg, and waist circumference of 111 cm. Weight increased during the control period by 0.7 kg but decreased by 2.6 kg during the intervention (net difference = -3.4 kg, P <.001), with 30% of participants losing 5% or more of body weight. Compared to the control period, there was a significant decrease in waist circumference (-3.6 cm, P =.006) and improvement in weight-related quality of life (5.7, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a culturally enhanced behavioral weight loss intervention in a predominately African American workplace setting. The workplace may be conducive for targeting African American women who are disproportionately affected by obesity.
Authors: Nicolaas P Pronk; Brian Martinson; Ronald C Kessler; Arne L Beck; Gregory E Simon; Philip Wang Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Antronette K Yancey; Lavonna B Lewis; David C Sloane; Joyce Jones Guinyard; Allison L Diamant; Lori M Nascimento; William J McCarthy Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2004 Mar-Apr
Authors: Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Angela M D'Antonio; Sharon M Smith; Gregory Kirkner; Sarah Levin Martin; Deborah Parra-Medina; Richard Schultz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tiffany L Carson; Claudia M Hardy; Eva Greene; Pamela L Carter; Glenda James; Edward E Partridge; Monica L Baskin Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2013-12-15
Authors: Maria D Sylvester; Emilee E Burgess; Taraneh Soleymani; Sunil Daniel; Bulent Turan; Mary Katherine Ray; Courtney T Howard; Mary M Boggiano Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Loretta T Lee; Amanda L Willig; April A Agne; Julie L Locher; Andrea L Cherrington Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Tiffany L Carson; Bradford E Jackson; Timiya S Nolan; Angela Williams; Monica L Baskin Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Seonad K Madden; Helen Skouteris; Cate Bailey; Andrew P Hills; Kiran D K Ahuja; Briony Hill Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Brenda S J Tay; David N Cox; Grant D Brinkworth; Aaron Davis; Sarah M Edney; Ian Gwilt; Jillian C Ryan Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Acadia W Buro; Monica Baskin; Darci Miller; Tayler Ward; Delia Smith West; L Robert Gore; Clement K Gwede; Elissa Epel; Tiffany L Carson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 4.135