BACKGROUND: Screen-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention are an attractive option for low-resource settings, but data on their long-term efficacy are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of two screen-and-treat approaches through 36 months of follow-up in a randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 6637 unscreened South African women aged 35-65 years who were tested for the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical samples underwent visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid staining and HIV serotesting. Of these, 6555 were randomly assigned to three study arms: 1) HPV-and-treat, in which all women with a positive HPV DNA test result underwent cryotherapy; 2) visual inspection-and-treat, in which all women with a positive visual inspection test result underwent cryotherapy; or 3) control, in which further evaluation or treatment was delayed for 6 months. All women underwent colposcopy with biopsy at 6 months. All women who were HPV DNA- or visual inspection-positive at enrollment, and a subset of all other women had extended follow-up to 36 months (n = 3639) with yearly colposcopy. The endpoint-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+)-was analyzed using actuarial life-table methods. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: After 36 months, there was a sustained statistically significant decrease in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the HPV-and-treat arm compared with the control arm (1.5% vs 5.6%, difference = 4.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8% to 5.3%, P < .001). The difference in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the visual inspection-and-treat arm compared with the control was less (3.8% vs 5.6%, difference = 1.8%, 95% CI = 0.4% to 3.2%, P = .002). Incident cases of CIN2+ (identified more than 12 months after enrollment) were less common in the HPV-and-treat arm (0.3%, 95% CI = 0.05% to 1.02%) than in the control (1.0%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.7%) or visual inspection-and-treat (1.3%, 95% CI = 0.8% to 2.1%) arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, a screen-and-treat approach using HPV DNA testing identified and treated prevalent cases of CIN2+ and appeared to reduce the number of incident cases of CIN2+ that developed more than 12 months after cryotherapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Screen-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention are an attractive option for low-resource settings, but data on their long-term efficacy are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of two screen-and-treat approaches through 36 months of follow-up in a randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 6637 unscreened South African women aged 35-65 years who were tested for the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical samples underwent visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid staining and HIV serotesting. Of these, 6555 were randomly assigned to three study arms: 1) HPV-and-treat, in which all women with a positive HPV DNA test result underwent cryotherapy; 2) visual inspection-and-treat, in which all women with a positive visual inspection test result underwent cryotherapy; or 3) control, in which further evaluation or treatment was delayed for 6 months. All women underwent colposcopy with biopsy at 6 months. All women who were HPV DNA- or visual inspection-positive at enrollment, and a subset of all other women had extended follow-up to 36 months (n = 3639) with yearly colposcopy. The endpoint-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+)-was analyzed using actuarial life-table methods. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: After 36 months, there was a sustained statistically significant decrease in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the HPV-and-treat arm compared with the control arm (1.5% vs 5.6%, difference = 4.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8% to 5.3%, P < .001). The difference in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the visual inspection-and-treat arm compared with the control was less (3.8% vs 5.6%, difference = 1.8%, 95% CI = 0.4% to 3.2%, P = .002). Incident cases of CIN2+ (identified more than 12 months after enrollment) were less common in the HPV-and-treat arm (0.3%, 95% CI = 0.05% to 1.02%) than in the control (1.0%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.7%) or visual inspection-and-treat (1.3%, 95% CI = 0.8% to 2.1%) arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, a screen-and-treat approach using HPV DNA testing identified and treated prevalent cases of CIN2+ and appeared to reduce the number of incident cases of CIN2+ that developed more than 12 months after cryotherapy.
Authors: Julia C Gage; Kayode O Ajenifuja; Nicolas A Wentzensen; Akinfolarin C Adepiti; Claire Eklund; Mary Reilly; Martha Hutchinson; Sholom Wacholder; Joe Harford; Amr S Soliman; Robert D Burk; Mark Schiffman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Marc Arbyn; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Mario Sideri; Joel Palefsky; Charles Lacey; Maura Gillison; Laia Bruni; Guglielmo Ronco; Nicolas Wentzensen; Julia Brotherton; You-Lin Qiao; Lynnette Denny; Jacob Bornstein; Laurent Abramowitz; Anna Giuliano; Massimo Tommasino; Joseph Monsonego Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Joel C Boggan; David K Walmer; Gregory Henderson; Nahida Chakhtoura; Schatzi H McCarthy; Harry J Beauvais; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.830