Literature DB >> 26617667

Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Lyndsay A Richardson1, Joseph Tota1, Eduardo L Franco1.   

Abstract

Although historically successful in reducing the burden of cervical cancer, Papanicolaou (Pap) testing faces numerous limitations. A growing body of evidence suggests that modern screening practice will benefit from primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the causative agent of cervical cancer. Molecular tests detecting the presence of HPV nucleic acids consistently demonstrate high sensitivity relative to Pap testing, and provide reliable, dichotomous results. Pap cytology is ideally suited to triage HPV-positive cases owing to its high test specificity, and the accuracy of cytological readings will be maximized in high-prevalence conditions. This algorithm of primary HPV testing with Pap triage has been shown to maintain the high sensitivity of HPV testing without compromising Pap cytology's strong ability to rule out falsely positive diagnoses. Given the anticipated decline of high-risk HPV-16 and -18 infections in the emergent post-HPV vaccination era, highly sensitive primary HPV testing is especially warranted. Novel screening technologies that identify HPV viral gene expression continue to emerge and seek to complement current HPV testing by identifying those women who may be at risk of progressive disease. How to best incorporate these new technologies into clinical practice presents our next great challenge. Implementation of novel algorithms for cervical screening is not a trivial task. Avoidance of exceedingly complex screening algorithms is an important priority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papanicolaou test; cervical cancer; human papillomavirus; human papillomavirus vaccine; mass screening; test performance

Year:  2011        PMID: 26617667      PMCID: PMC4659856          DOI: 10.1586/eog.11.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1747-4108


  106 in total

Review 1.  The role of HPV DNA testing in the follow-up period after treatment for CIN: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Marc Arbyn; Alexandros Sotiriadis; Emmanuel Diakomanolis; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; George Koliopoulos; George Makrydimas; Jovan Tofoski; Dimitrios H Roukos
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  Statement on HPV DNA test utilization.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Jacalyn L Papillo; Diane D Davey
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

3.  Trials comparing cytology with human papillomavirus screening.

Authors:  M Arbyn; G Ronco; C J L M Meijer; P Naucler
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Johannes Berkhof; Veerle M Coupé; Johannes A Bogaards; Folkert J van Kemenade; Theo J Helmerhorst; Peter J Snijders; Chris J Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Christine Bergeron; Frederic Cas; Svetlana Vinokurova; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: a cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  J Belinson; Y L Qiao; R Pretorius; W H Zhang; P Elson; L Li; Q J Pan; C Fischer; A Lorincz; D Zahniser
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective.

Authors:  Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch; Xavier Castellsagué; Mireia Díaz; Silvia de Sanjose; Doudja Hammouda; Keerti V Shah; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Racial and ethnic disparities in cervical cancer incidence rates in the United States, 1992-2003.

Authors:  Jean A McDougall; Margaret M Madeleine; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Cervical cancer screening following prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Eduardo L Franco; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Frank Buntinx; Marc Van Ranst; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.310

View more
  6 in total

1.  The road ahead for cervical cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  J E Tota; A V Ramana-Kumar; Z El-Khatib; E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  HPV self-sampling: A promising approach to reduce cervical cancer screening disparities in Canada.

Authors:  M Vahabi; A Lofters
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mélanie Drolet; Élodie Bénard; Norma Pérez; Marc Brisson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Evaluation of partial genotyping with HPV16/18 for triage of HPV positive, cytology negative women in the COMPACT study.

Authors:  Sharon J B Hanley; Hiromasa Fujita; Satomi Aoyama-Kikawa; Mitsunori Kasamo; Toshihiko Torigoe; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Sakuragi Noriaki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Understanding facilitators and barriers to follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening examination among women living in remote areas of Romania: a qualitative study protocol.

Authors:  Linda Nyanchoka; Andreea Damian; Mari Nygård
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions regarding human papillomavirus among university students in Hail, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Farhan Alshammari; Kashif Ullah Khan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.