Literature DB >> 20884722

Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory.

Kerstin Jost1, Richard L Bryck, Edward K Vogel, Ulrich Mayr.   

Abstract

While it is well known that working memory functions decline with age, the functional reasons for this decline are not well understood. A factor that has proven critical for general individual differences in visual working memory capacity is the efficiency of filtering irrelevant information. Here, we examine to what degree this factor is also responsible for age differences in working memory. Young and old participants performed a change-detection task where some items in the encoding display were marked as irrelevant. The contralateral delay activity of the electroencephalogram was used to assess individual participants' filtering efficiency (see Vogel EK, McCollough AW, Machizawa MG. 2005. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. 438:500-503.). Older adults showed smaller filtering scores than young adults, but only early in the retention interval, suggesting that efficient filtering was delayed. In contrast, age-independent individual differences in filtering were reflected primarily later in the retention interval. Thus, age and individual differences in filtering are reflected in different ways showing that old adults are not simply like less efficiently performing young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884722     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  67 in total

Review 1.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction.

Authors:  Fiona McNab; Peter Zeidman; Robb B Rutledge; Peter Smittenaar; Harriet R Brown; Rick A Adams; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neurophysiological evidence of impaired attention and working memory in untreated hematologic cancer patients.

Authors:  D E Anderson; V R Bhatt; K Schmid; S A Holstein; M Lunning; A M Berger; M Rizzo
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ayala S Allon; Gili Vixman; Roy Luria
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-29

6.  Effect of attentional interference on balance recovery in older adults.

Authors:  C Elaine Little; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Melissa K Johnson; Robert P McMahon; Benjamin M Robinson; Alexander N Harvey; Britta Hahn; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Sarah Grison; Xuefei Gao; Kiel Christianson; Daniel G Morrow; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-11-30

10.  Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: an ERP study.

Authors:  Audrey Duarte; Patricia Hearons; Yashu Jiang; Mary Courtney Delvin; Rachel N Newsome; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.