Literature DB >> 2088380

Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinically failed restorations.

J R Kelly1, R Giordano, R Pober, M J Cima.   

Abstract

Fractography was used to study all-ceramic restorations that had failed clinically. Some basic tenets of fracture mechanics and fractography are reviewed and related to the examination of clinically failed all-ceramic restorations. Dicor and Cerestore restorations that had failed either at trial placement or 17 to 36 months postcementation were evaluated. Failed Dicor restorations were studied to determine the origin of failure and calculate the intraoral stress at failure. Descriptive information regarding crack origin and crack path were obtained from failed restorations constructed of first-generation Cerestore. A majority of the crowns apparently failed from the internal surface, indicating this as the highest tensile surface and/or the location of the largest flaws. Flaws were identified as being related to fabrication or inherent in the ceramic microstructure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2088380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  22 in total

1.  Contact damage in model dental multilayers: an investigation of the influence of indenter size.

Authors:  P Shrotriya; R Wang; N Katsube; R Seghi; W O Soboyejo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Fractographic ceramic failure analysis using the replica technique.

Authors:  Susanne S Scherrer; Janet B Quinn; George D Quinn; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Statistical failure analysis of adhesive resin cement bonded dental ceramics.

Authors:  Yaou Wang; Noriko Katsube; Robert R Seghi; Stanislav I Rokhlin
Journal:  Eng Fract Mech       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Survival Predictions of Ceramic Crowns Using Statistical Fracture Mechanics.

Authors:  S Nasrin; N Katsube; R R Seghi; S I Rokhlin
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores.

Authors:  Bu-Kyung Choi; Jung-Suk Han; Jae-Ho Yang; Jai-Bong Lee; Sung-Hun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparison of the wet and dry fatigue properties of all ceramic crowns.

Authors:  L C Sobrinho; R H Glover; J C Knowles; M J Cattell
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  L C Sobrinho; M J Cattell; J C Knowles
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Competition of fracture mechanisms in monolithic dental ceramics: flat model systems.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jae-Won Kim; Sanjit Bhowmick; Van P Thompson; E Dianne Rekow
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Fracture-resistant monolithic dental crowns.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Zhisong Mai; Amir Barani; Mark Bush; Brian Lawn
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  A fractographic study of clinically retrieved zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Zhen Pang; Asima Chughtai; Irena Sailer; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.