Literature DB >> 15348687

Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns.

L C Sobrinho1, M J Cattell, J C Knowles.   

Abstract

This paper compares the fracture strength of three types of all-ceramic crown shape systems (In ceram, OPC and IPS Empress) cemented with either a commercial resin cement, zinc phosphate or glass ionomer. Twenty test crown shapes with 8 mm diameter and 8.5 mm height were fabricated for each type of ceramic. Ten In ceram crown shapes were luted on the die using zinc phosphate, while ten OPCTM and IPS Empress were luted using resin cement specified for the particular system. Another ten specimens each, of In ceram, OPC and IPS Empress, were luted on the die using a glass ionomer. The crown shapes were fractured in a mechanical testing machine (Instron) using a steel ball, 4 mm diameter, that contacted the occlusal surface and the resulting data were statistically analysed using a Mann-Whitney test. The results showed that: (1) In ceram crown shapes luted with zinc phosphate were significantly stronger than IPS Empress crown shapes luted with resin cement (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed compared with OPC crown shapes luted with resin cement. No statistical difference was found between OPC and IPS Empress crown shapes. (2) When the three ceramics were luted with glass ionomer, the In ceram was significantly stronger than OPC (p < 0.05) and IPS Empress (p < 0.05). OPC was significantly stronger than IPS Empress (p < 0.05).

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 15348687     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008905308040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  20 in total

1.  A bond strength study of luted castable ceramic restorations.

Authors:  P M McInnes-Ledoux; W R Ledoux; R Weinberg
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  [Investigation of fracture resistance of full porcelain crowns].

Authors:  K Ludwig
Journal:  Dent Labor (Munch)       Date:  1991-05

3.  Seating accuracy and fracture strength of vented and nonvented ceramic crowns luted with three cements.

Authors:  M T Clark; M W Richards; J C Meiers
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Flexure tests on dental ceramics.

Authors:  K Zeng; A Odén; D Rowcliffe
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all-ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture.

Authors:  S D Campbell
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Ceramo-metal restoration. State of the science.

Authors:  E J Riley
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1977-10

7.  Resistance to fracture of metal ceramic and all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  D Castellani; T Baccetti; A Giovannoni; U D Bernardini
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth.

Authors:  D Dietschi; M Maeder; J M Meyer; J Holz
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.677

9.  The effect of crown length on the fracture resistance of posterior porcelain and glass-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  S S Scherrer; W G de Rijk
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Compressive strength of two modern all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  L Pröbster
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of convergence angle and luting agent on the fracture strength of In ceram crowns.

Authors:  L Correr Sobrinho; S Consani; J C Knowles
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials.

Authors:  Munir Tolga Yucel; Isa Yondem; Filiz Aykent; Oğuz Eraslan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.