Literature DB >> 20883004

On the molecular origins of biomass recalcitrance: the interaction network and solvation structures of cellulose microfibrils.

Adam S Gross1, Jhih-Wei Chu.   

Abstract

Biomass recalcitrance is a fundamental bottleneck to producing fuels from renewable sources. To understand its molecular origin, we characterize the interaction network and solvation structures of cellulose microfibrils via all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. The network is divided into three components: intrachain, interchain, and intersheet interactions. Analysis of their spatial dependence and interaction energetics indicate that intersheet interactions are the most robust and strongest component and do not display a noticeable dependence on solvent exposure. Conversely, the strength of surface-exposed intrachain and interchain hydrogen bonds is significantly reduced. Comparing the interaction networks of I(β) and I(α) cellulose also shows that the number of intersheet interactions is a clear descriptor that distinguishes the two allomorphs and is consistent with the observation that I(β) is the more stable form. These results highlight the dominant role of the often-overlooked intersheet interactions in giving rise to biomass recalcitrance. We also analyze the solvation structures around the surfaces of microfibrils and show that the structural and chemical features at cellulose surfaces constrict water molecules into specific density profiles and pair correlation functions. Calculations of water density and compressibility in the hydration shell show noticeable but not drastic differences. Therefore, specific solvation structures are more prominent signatures of different surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20883004     DOI: 10.1021/jp106452m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  7 in total

1.  Unique aspects of the structure and dynamics of elementary Iβ cellulose microfibrils revealed by computational simulations.

Authors:  Daniel P Oehme; Matthew T Downton; Monika S Doblin; John Wagner; Michael J Gidley; Antony Bacic
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Quantifying density fluctuations in volumes of all shapes and sizes using indirect umbrella sampling.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; David Chandler; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  J Stat Phys       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  The potential of C4 grasses for cellulosic biofuel production.

Authors:  Tim van der Weijde; Claire L Alvim Kamei; Andres F Torres; Wilfred Vermerris; Oene Dolstra; Richard G F Visser; Luisa M Trindade
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Potentials, Challenges, and Genetic and Genomic Resources for Sugarcane Biomass Improvement.

Authors:  Ramkrishna Kandel; Xiping Yang; Jian Song; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Towards a molecular understanding of cellulose dissolution in ionic liquids: anion/cation effect, synergistic mechanism and physicochemical aspects.

Authors:  Yao Li; Jianji Wang; Xiaomin Liu; Suojiang Zhang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  The role of urea in the solubility of cellulose in aqueous quaternary ammonium hydroxide.

Authors:  Mikayla G Walters; Albaraa D Mando; W Matthew Reichert; Christy W West; Kevin N West; Brooks D Rabideau
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Molecular Insight into the Self-Assembly Process of Cellulose Iβ Microfibril.

Authors:  Tran Thi Minh Thu; Rodrigo A Moreira; Stefan A L Weber; Adolfo B Poma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 6.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.